Sri Nagaraj v. Smt Rangamma
Case brief
What is this about?
Second appeal dismissed for non-prosecution (default of appellant's counsel) — High Court of Karnataka, 05.12.2025, H.P. Sandesh J., oral judgment on admission. Filed under Section 100 CPC. Impugned order: R.A.No.50/2023 (VII Additional District Judge, Tumakuru, 19.02.2024), confirming O.S.No.267/2018 (II Additional Senior Civil Judge and JMFC, Tumakuru, 06.03.2023). Parties: Nagaraj v. Rangamma, Jayamma, Siddagangamma, Gangadharaiah K.R., Jayamma K.R., Kumara, Lakshmidevamma. Subject classification PAR/POS. Counsel absent despite earlier 'papers misplaced' submission at 28.11.2025 listing; no merits decided; no precedent cited; of procedural interest only (default dismissal), limited value as substantive citation.
What did the court decide?
The matter was called twice in the morning and also in the afternoon, and there was no representation on behalf of the appellant.