Dismissed¶¶37

Sri Siddaramaiah v. Smt. P.Varalakshmamma

Karnataka HC8 Jan 2025WP/9626/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Karnataka High Court (Bengaluru); NC: 2025:KHC:590; WP No. 9626 of 2021 (GM-RES); Hon'ble Ms. Justice Jyoti Mulimani; order dated 08-01-2025; writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India; dismissed as withdrawn at preliminary hearing on petitioners' memo; counsel Sri. Rajendra.V.G.; undertaking not to seek recall of the order or file a review petition; petitioners: Siddaramaiah, Rathnamma, H.Nagaraju, Jayalakshmamma, Parvathamma, Shanthamma; respondents: P.Varalakshmamma, Balaramappa, Hanumantharayappa, Eramma; no merits adjudicated; no precedent cited; no quantum awarded.

What did the court decide?

Writ Petition dismissed as withdrawn, as prayed in the memo filed by the petitioners; the oral submission and memo were placed on record. ¶¶37

Sri Siddaramaiah Vs Smt. P.Varalakshmamma — Writ and Judicial Review | Karnataka HC (2025)

¶1

¶2

NC: 2025:KHC:590 WP No. 9626 of 2021

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

¶4

DATED THIS THE 8^TH DAY OF JANUARY, 2025

¶5

BEFORE

¶6

THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI MULIMANI WRIT PETITION NO. 9626 OF 2021 (GM-RES)

¶7

BETWEEN:

¶8

SRI SIDDARAMAIAH S/O LATE HANUMATHAPPA, AGED ABOUT 68 YEARS, R/AT T VENKATAPURA, THEETHA POST, KORATAGERE TALUK, TUMKUR DISTRICT-572 129.

¶9

SMT RATHNAMMA W/O KENGANNA, AGED ABOUT 49 YEARS, R/AT E.RAMAGIRI VILLAGE, AMADALAGONDI POST, MADAKASIRA TALUK, ANANTHPUR DISTRICT, ANDRA PRADESH-515 301.

¶10

Digitally signed by THEJASKUMAR N Location: High Court of Karnataka

¶11

SRI H.NAGARAJU S/O LATE HANUMTHAPPA, AGED ABOUT 44 YEARS, R/AT E.RAMAGIRI VILLAGE, AMADALAGONDI POST, MADAKASIRA TALUK, ANANTHPUR DISTRICT, ANDRA PRADESH-515 301.

¶12

SMT. JAYALAKSHMAMMA W/O RAMACHANDRAIAH, D/O LATE SIDDAPPA, AGED ABOUT 67 YEARS, R/AT BENDONI VILLAGE,

¶13

¶14

NC: 2025:KHC:590 WP No. 9626 of 2021

¶15

MALLEKAVU POST, KORATAGERE TALUK, TUMKUR DISTRICT-572 129.

¶16

SMT.PARVATHAMMA W/O LATE SIDDAPPA, AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS, R/AT BITTINAKURIKE VILLAGE, DEVALAPURU POST, TUMKURU TALUK, TUMKURU DISTRICT-572 138.

¶17

SMT. SHANTHAMMA W/O SRIRAMAPPA, D/O LATE SIDDAPPA, R/AT E.RAMAGIRI VILLAGE, AMADALAGONDI POST, MADAKASIRA TALUK, ANANTHPUR DISTRICT, ANDRA PRADESH-515 301.

¶18

…PETITIONERS

¶19

(BY SRI. RAJENDRA.V.G., ADVOCATE)

¶20

AND:

¶21

SMT. P.VARALAKSHMAMMA W/O S.NARASIMHAIAH, AGED ABOUT 53 YEARS, R/AT VEERLAGONDI VILLAGE, KANMADI POST, PAVAGADA TALUK, TUMKUR -561 202.

¶22

SRI.BALARAMAPPA S/O LATE SIDDAPPA, AGED ABOUT 56 YEARS, R/AT E.RAMAGIRI VILLAGE, AMADALAGONDI POST, MADAKASIRA TALUK, ANANTHPUR DISTRICT, ANDRA PRADESH-515 301.

¶23

¶24

NC: 2025:KHC:590 WP No. 9626 of 2021

¶25

SRI.HANUMANTHARAYAPPA S/O LATE SIDDAPPA, AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS, R/AT E.RAMAGIRI VILLAGE, AMADALAGONDI POST, MADAKASIRA TALUK, ANANTHPUR DISTRICT, ANDRA PRADESH-515 301.

¶26

SMT. ERAMMA W/O LATE UGRAPPA, AGED ABOUT 57 YEARS, R/AT E.RAMAGIRI VILLAGE, AMADALAGONDI POST, MADAKASIRA TALUK, ANANTHPUR DISTRICT, ANDRA PRADESH-515 301.

¶27

…RESPONDENTS

¶28

THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, SEEKING CERTAIN RELIEFS.

¶29

THIS WRIT PETITION IS LISTED FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, AN ORDER IS MADE AS UNDER:

¶30

ORAL ORDER

¶31

Sri.Rajendra.V.G., counsel for the petitioners has appeared in person.

¶32

Counsel submits that a memo has been filed stating that the Writ Petition may be dismissed as withdrawn. Counsel therefore, submits that the memo may be placed on record and the Writ Petition may be dismissed as withdrawn.

¶33

¶34

NC: 2025:KHC:590 WP No. 9626 of 2021

¶35

When queried, counsel Sri.Rajendra.V.G., submits that a conscious decision is taken by him and the petitioners to withdraw the Writ Petition and if an order is passed, they shall not seek for recalling the same or file review petition.

¶36

The oral submission made by counsel for the petitioner and the memo is placed on record.

¶37

The Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn.

¶38

Sd/(JYOTI MULIMANI) JUDGE

¶39

TKN List No.: 3 Sl No.: 25

Sri Siddaramaiah v. Smt. P.Varalakshmamma

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sri Siddaramaiah v. Smt. P.Varalakshmamma

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Sri Chetan B R Vs Smt Vasantha Gopalaiah

Sri M Gururaj Vs the State of Karnataka

Muniraju a Vs the Authorised Officer/Senior Manager

Sri Syed Farooq Vs Sri Syed Sayeed

Corporation Bank Officers Organisation Vs the Union of India

Direct Dialogue Initiatives India Private Limited Vs Office of the Special Director of Enforcement