Dismissed¶35

Corporation Bank Officers Organisation v. the Union of India

Karnataka HC8 Jan 2025WP/10423/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

WP 10423/2021 (GM-RES); NC: 2025:KHC:591; High Court of Karnataka at Bengaluru; Justice Jyoti Mulimani; decided 08-01-2025; petitioner: Corporation Bank Officers' Organisation (General Secretary Sathish Shetty); respondents: Union of India (Law; Finance/Department of Financial Services), Reserve Bank of India (Mumbai; Bangalore), Union Bank of India, Corporation Bank, Andhra Bank; advocates: Sri. Vinaya.H. (petitioner), Smt. Anupama Hegde (R1 & R2); Articles 226 and 227, Constitution of India; preliminary hearing; dismissed as not pressed at counsel's request; no merits adjudicated; no quantum.

What the court decided

AI extract

Corporation Bank Officers Organisation Vs the… — Writ and Judicial Review | Karnataka HC (2025)

¶1

¶2

NC: 2025:KHC:591 WP No. 10423 of 2021

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

¶4

DATED THIS THE 8^TH DAY OF JANUARY, 2025

¶5

BEFORE

¶6

THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI MULIMANI WRIT PETITION NO. 10423 OF 2021 (GM-RES)

¶7

BETWEEN:

¶8

CORPORATION BANK OFFICERS' ORGANISATION, REGISTERED OFFICE AT: 106, LOBO, PRABHU COURT, LIGHT HOUSE HILL ROAD, MANGALORE-575 001, REPRESENTED BY ITS GENERAL SECRETARY, MR. SATHISH SHETTY. S/O LATE VENKATRAMAN SHETTY, AGE 52 YEARS.

¶9

…PETITIONER

¶10

(BY SRI. VINAYA.H., ADVOCATE FOR SRI. RAVINDRA PRASAD.B., ADVOCATE)

¶11

AND:

¶12

THE UNION OF INDIA, REPRESENTED BY SECRETARY, LAW AND PARLIAMENTARY AFFAIRS, PARLIAMENT HOUSE, NEW DELHI-110 001.

¶13

Digitally signed by THEJASKUMAR N Location: High Court of Karnataka

¶14

THE UNION OF INDIA, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, FINANCE AND CORPORATE AFFAIRS, DEPARTMENT OF FINANCIAL SERVICES, JEEVAN DEEP BUILDING, PARLIAMENTARY STREET, NEW DELHI-110 001.

¶15

THE RESERVE BANK OF INDIA, REPRESENTED BY ITS GOVERNOR,

¶16

¶17

NC: 2025:KHC:591 WP No. 10423 of 2021

¶18

CENTRAL OFFICE BUILDING, 18^TH FLOOR, SHAHID BHAGAT SINGH ROAD, MUMBAI-400 001.

¶19

THE RESERVE BANK OF INDIA, REPRESENTED BY ITS GOVERNOR, NRUPATHUNGA ROAD, BANGALORE-01. REPRESENTED BY ITS EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR.

¶20

THE UNION BANK OF INDIA, CENTRAL OFFICE, UNION BANK BHAVAN, NO.239, VIDHAN BHAVAN MARG, NARIMAN POINT MUMBAI-400 021. REPRESENTED BY ITS CEO AND MANAGING DIRECTOR.

¶21

THE CORPORATION BANK, HAVING ITS HEAD OFFICE PANDESHWARA, MANGALORE-575 001. REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR / CEO.

¶22

THE ANDHRA BANK HAVING ITS HEAD OFFICE DR.PATTABHI BHAVAN, 5-9-11, SAIFABAD, HYDERABAD-500 004. REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR / CEO.

¶23

…RESPONDENTS

¶24

(BY SMT. ANUPAMA HEGDE., ADVOCATE FOR R1 & 2)

¶25

THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, SEEKING CERTAIN RELIEFS.

¶26

THIS WRIT PETITION IS LISTED FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, AN ORDER IS MADE AS UNDER:

¶27

¶28

NC: 2025:KHC:591 WP No. 10423 of 2021

¶29

ORAL ORDER

¶30

Sri.Vinaya.H., counsel on behalf of Sri.Ravindra Prasad.B., for the petitioner has appeared in person.

¶31

Smt.Anupama Hegde., counsel for respondents 1 and 2 has appeared through video conferencing.

¶32

Counsel for the petitioner submits that the Writ Petition may be dismissed as not pressed.

¶33

When queried, counsel Sri.Vinaya.H., submits that a conscious decision is taken by him and the petitioner to dismiss the Writ petition as not pressed and if an order is passed, they shall not seek for recalling the same or file review petition.

¶34

The oral submission made by counsel for the petitioner is placed on record.

¶35

The Writ Petition is dismissed as not pressed.

¶36

Sd/(JYOTI MULIMANI) JUDGE

¶37

TKN List No.: 3 Sl No.: 31

Corporation Bank Officers Organisation v. the Union of India

Case brief

What is this about?

What the court decided

Corporation Bank Officers Organisation v. the Union of India

Case brief

What is this about?

What the court decided

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Sri Chetan B R Vs Smt Vasantha Gopalaiah

Sri M Gururaj Vs the State of Karnataka

Muniraju a Vs the Authorised Officer/Senior Manager

Sri Syed Farooq Vs Sri Syed Sayeed

Sri Siddaramaiah Vs Smt. P.Varalakshmamma

Direct Dialogue Initiatives India Private Limited Vs Office of the Special Director of Enforcement