Dismissed¶25

Smt. Chikkanna v. Smt. Bhagyamma

Karnataka HC1 Apr 2025WP/8548/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

High Court of Karnataka, WP No. 8548 of 2021 (GM-FC), Chikkanna v. Bhagyamma and Manjunath; certiorari sought under Article 227 against interim order dated 23/02/2021 on IA 20 in M.C. No.3340/2013 (IIIrd Additional Family Judge, Bengaluru); petition dismissed as infructuous on 01.04.2025 by Justice Pradeep Singh Yerur after the parties settled in MFA No.7064/2021 dated 17.12.2024; no holding on merits; respondent No.2 served and unrepresented.

What did the court decide?

In view of the memo filed by learned counsel for the petitioner and his submission that the underlying M.C. proceedings ended in a compromise, the writ petition is dismissed as having become infructuous. The merits of the challenge were not decided. ¶25

Smt. Chikkanna Vs Smt. Bhagyamma — Writ and Judicial Review | Karnataka HC (2025)

¶1

1 - NC: 2025:KHC:13646 WP No. 8548 of 2021

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 1^ST DAY OF APRIL, 2025 BEFORE

¶3

THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE PRADEEP SINGH YERUR WRIT PETITION NO. 8548 OF 2021 (GM-FC)

¶4

BETWEEN:

¶5

SRI.CHIKKANNA S/O NAGAPPA AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS R/AT BYADARAHALLI VISHWANEEDAM POST MAGADI ROAD BENGALURU -560 091

¶6

…PETITIONER

¶7

(BY SRI. T.SESHAGIRI RAO.,ADVOCATE)

¶8

AND:

¶9

Digitally signed by GAVRIBIDANUR SUBRAMANYA GUPTA SREENATH Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA

¶10

SMT.BHAGYAMMA EARLIER WEDDED TO THE PETITIONER NAMELY SRI CHIKKANNA PRESENTLY LIVING ALONG WITH THE RESPONDENT NO.2 NAMELY SRI MANJUNATH AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS R/AT C/O SRI HANUMANTHARAJU S/O LATE HANUMAIAH NEAR KABBALAMMA TEMPLE BYADARAHALLI VISHWANEEDAM POST BENGALURU -560 091

¶11

SRI MANJUNATH AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS, R/AT C/O HANUMANTHARAJU S/O LATE HANUMAIAH NEAR KABBALAMMA TEMPLE BYADARAHALLI

¶12

2 - NC: 2025:KHC:13646 WP No. 8548 of 2021

¶13

VISHWANEEDAM POST BENGALURU -560 091

¶14

…RESPONDENTS

¶15

(BY SRI.VASANTH KUMAR H T.,ADVOCATE FOR R-1; NOTICE TO R-2 SERVED AND UNREPRESENTED)

¶16

THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO ISSUE A WRIT OF CERTIORARI OR ANY OTHER WRIT OR ORDER OR DIRECTION QUASHING OF THE IMPUGNED ORDER 23/02/2021 PASSED BY THE IIIRD ADDITIONAL FAMILY JUDGE, BENGALURU ON IA 20 IN MC. NO. 3340/2013 VIDE ANNEXURE-H.

¶17

THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, IN 'B' GROUP THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:

¶18

CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE PRADEEP SINGH YERUR

¶19

ORAL ORDER

¶20

Learned counsel for petitioner has filed a memo seeking withdrawal of the petition on the ground that the petition has become infructuous. He filed a memo, which reads as under:

¶21

"The counsel for the petitioner submits as follows:

¶22

The above Writ Petition had been filed by the petitioner herein as against an interim order dated 23.02.2021 one passed in M.C. No.3340/2013. Ultimately the said M.C. proceedings ended in a compromise in MFA No.7064/2021 dated 17.12.2024. In view of the same, the above writ petition does not survive. Hence kindly dispose of the same as it has been settled by the parties in MFA No.7064/2024 in the interest of Justice and Equity."

¶23