Dismissed¶26

Karthik Vedanayagam v. Mrs.Akhila Karthik

Karnataka HC1 Apr 2025WP/5542/2020

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Dismissed-as-infructuous Article 227 writ petition (GM-FC) challenging interlocutory order dated 05.10.2019 on I.A.No.II in Crl.M.C.No.2/2019 of the I Addl. Principal Judge, Family Court, D.K., Mangaluru; withdrawal memo tendered at preliminary hearing; Justice Pradeep Singh Yerur, 01.04.2025; parties Karthik Vedanayagam v. Akhila Karthik and minor Anika; no issues framed, no holdings, no precedents engaged.

What the court decided

AI extract

Karthik Vedanayagam Vs Mrs.Akhila Karthik — Writ and Judicial Review | Karnataka HC (2025)

¶1

¶2

NC: 2025:KHC:13521 WP No. 5542 of 2020

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

¶4

DATED THIS THE 1^ST DAY OF APRIL, 2025

¶5

BEFORE

¶6

THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE PRADEEP SINGH YERUR WRIT PETITION NO. 5542 OF 2020 (GM-FC)

¶7

BETWEEN:

¶8

KARTHIK VEDANAYAGAM AGED 37 YEARS, S/O MR.VEDANAYAGAM RAMASAMY WORKING AT IRISH CONSULATE, C/O BIOCON LTD 20^TH K.M.HOSUR ROAD, ELECTRONIC CITY, PHASE II, BENGALURU-560 100 AND R/AT D-005, SJR EQUINOX OPP VELANKANI TECH PRAK ELECTRONIC CITY-PHASE I BENGALURU-560 100 …PETITIONER

¶9

(BY SRI. APPAIAH P B., ADV.)

¶10

AND:

¶11

Digitally signed by GAVRIBIDANUR SUBRAMANYA GUPTA SREENATH Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA

¶12

MRS.AKHILA KARTHIK AGED 32 YEARS W/O MR.KARTHIK VEDANAYAGAM D/O MR.UMESH BRAHMMAVAR

¶13

MISS ANIKA

¶14

AGED 1 YEAR 10 MONTHS D/O MR.KARTHIK VEDANAYAGAM A MINOR REPRESENTED BY HER MOTHER AND NATURAL GUARDIAN VIZ RESPONDENT NO.1

¶15

BOTH ARE PREVIOUSLY R/AT "MARIAN ASPIRE" FLAT NO.103, KOTEKANI ROAD

¶16

2 - NC: 2025:KHC:13521 WP No. 5542 of 2020

¶17

URWA STORE, NEAR SAINIK REST HOUSE, MANGALORE - 575 006 AND PRESENTLY R/AT "SHAMBHAVI", 5-111/4F, ANEKERE, KUNTALPADY ROAD, KARKALA - 574 104. UDUPI DISTRICT.

¶18

…RESPONDENTS

¶19

(BY SRI. M. SUDHAKAR PAI, ADVOCATE FOR C/R-1 & R-2)

¶20

THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE ORDER DATED.5.10.2019 PASSED BY THE LEARNED I ADDL. PRINCIPAL JUDGE FAMILY COURT D.K. MANGALURU ON I.A.NO. II IN CRL. M.C.NO.2/2019, AS AT ANNEXURE-A.

¶21

THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:

¶22

CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE PRADEEP SINGH YERUR

¶23

ORAL ORDER

¶24

Learned counsel for the petitioner has filed a memo seeking withdrawal of the petition as the same has become infructuous .

¶25

2. The said memo is taken on record.

¶26

Accordingly, the petition is dismissed as having become