Bipin Bhadran v. Veena Sreekala Nair
Case brief
What is this about?
Karnataka High Court, Bengaluru; Writ Petition No. 5453 of 2025 (GM-FC); decided 12 June 2025 by Justice Lalitha Kanneganti; filed under Articles 226 and 227, Constitution of India; petitioner Bipin Bhadran (counsel Arun Govindraj) sought quashing of Family Court Bengaluru order dated 16.12.2024 on IA No. II in G and WC No. 128/2024 (II Additional Principal Judge) and allowance of the interim application; respondent Veena Sreekala Nair (counsel Mahesh C.M); matter referred to Mediation; amicable settlement recorded in mediation report dated 09.04.2025; writ petition disposed of, all interim applications closed; no precedent cited; no monetary quantum.
What did the court decide?
Per the terms of the mediation report dated 09.04.2025, the parties have amicably settled the matter; consequently nothing survives in the writ petition, which the Court disposed of, with all interim applications in the petition standing closed.