Dismissed¶38

H. Krishna Prabhu v. the Commissioner

Karnataka HC9 Oct 2025WP/43016/2016

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Karnataka HC, Justice R. Nataraj, WP No. 43016 of 2016 (LB-BMP), decided 09.10.2025; BBMP eviction/vacation notice SAKANIA/KEGOWNA/PR/694/16-17 dated 01.08.2016 challenged via Articles 226 and 227; petition earlier restored on 28.04.2025 with Rs.2,500 cost; additional Rs.2,500 cost on 09.07.2025 to High Court Advocates' Clerks Benevolent Fund; dismissed for non-prosecution; no findings on merits, no precedents cited.

What did the court decide?

The writ petition is dismissed for non-prosecution, following the petitioner's failure to comply with the cost-imposed orders of 28.04.2025 and 09.07.2025 and absence of representation on the day of hearing. ¶38

H. Krishna Prabhu Vs the Commissioner — Writ and Judicial Review | Karnataka HC (2025)

¶1

1 - NC: 2025:KHC:40045 WP No. 43016 of 2016

¶2

HC-KAR

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

¶4

DATED THIS THE 9^TH DAY OF OCTOBER, 2025

¶5

BEFORE

¶6

THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R. NATARAJ WRIT PETITION NO. 43016 OF 2016 (LB-BMP)

¶7

BETWEEN:

¶8

H. KRISHNA PRABHU

¶9

S/O. LATE H. MANJUNATHA PRABHU, AGED ABOUT 59 YEARS, NO.120, BEHIND KABIR MUTT ROAD, SUNKENAHALLI, HANUMANTHANAGARA, BENGALURU-560 019. DEAD BY LRS

¶10

1(a) SMT. SHOBITHA W/O LATE KRISHNA PRABHU AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS,

¶11

1(b) SMT. BHAVANI AMITHA D/O LATE KRISHNA PRABHU AGED ABOUT 39 YEARS,

¶12

Digitally signed by SUMA Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA

¶13

1(c) SRI. MAHENDRA PRABHU S/O LATE KRISHNA PRABHU AGED ABOUT 37 YEARS,

¶14

1(d) VEERENDRA PRABHU S/O LATE KRISHNA PRABHU AGED ABOUT 31 YEARS,

¶15

ALL ARE RESIDING AT: NO.154, 3^RD CROSS, 1^ST MAIN ROAD, HANUMANTHA NAGAR, BANGALORE-560019.

¶16

AMENDED AS PER ORDER DATED 24.03.2022

¶17

…PETITIONERS

¶18

(BY SMT. KAVITHA D., ADVOCATE)

¶19

2 - NC: 2025:KHC:40045 WP No. 43016 of 2016

¶20

HC-KAR

¶21

AND:

¶22

THE COMMISSIONER BRUHAT BENGALURU MAHANAGARA PALIKE, N.R. SQUARE, BENGALURU-560 001.

¶23

THE JOINT COMMISSIONER BRUHAT BENGALURU MAHANAGARA PALIKE, N.R. SQUARE, BENGALURU-560 001.

¶24

DEPUTY REVENUE OFFICER (BASAVANAGUDI) BENGALURU MAHANAGARA PALIKE, N.R. SQUARE, BENGALURU-560 001.

¶25

ASSISTANT REVENUE OFFICER BRUHAT BENGALURU MAHANAGARA PALIKE, KEMPEGOWDA NAGARA SUB DIVISION, J.C. ROAD, 1^ST FLOOR, BENGALURU-560 001.

¶26

THE ASSISTANT EXECUTIVE ENGINEER BRUHAT BENGALURU MAHANAGARA PALIKE, KEMPEGOWDA NAGAR SUB-DIVISION, J.C. ROAD, BENGALURU-560 001.

¶27

…RESPONDENTS

¶28

(BY SRI. N.R.JAGADEESWARA, ADVOCATE FOR RESPONDENT NOS.1 TO 5)

¶29

THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE IMPUGNED NOTICE NO.SAKANIA/KEGOWNA/PR/694/16-17 DATED 01.08.2016 ISSUED BY RESPONDENT NO.5 CALLING UPON THE PETITIONER TO VACANT AND HAND OVER PHYSICAL POSSESSION OF THE SCHEDULE PREMISES UNDER ANNEXURE-L AND ETC.

¶30

THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN 'B' GROUP, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:

¶31

¶32

NC: 2025:KHC:40045 WP No. 43016 of 2016

¶33

HC-KAR

¶34

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R. NATARAJ

¶35

ORAL ORDER

¶36

This Court in terms of the order dated 28.04.2025, had restored the writ petition by imposing cost of Rs.2,500/payable to the respondent - Bruhat Bengaluru Mahanagara Palike.

¶37

When the matter was listed on 09.07.2025, this Court noticed that there was no compliance of the order dated 28.04.2025. Nonetheless, a week’s time was granted by imposing additional cost of Rs.2,500/- payable to the High Court Advocates' Clerks Benevolent Fund. Even today, there is no representation for the petitioner.

¶38

Hence, the Petition is dismissed for non-prosecution .

¶39

Sd/(R. NATARAJ) JUDGE

¶40

SMA

¶41

List No.: 1 Sl No.: 60

H. Krishna Prabhu v. the Commissioner

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

H. Krishna Prabhu v. the Commissioner

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases

Sri. Nagaraju. T. R. Vs the State of Karnataka

Smt. Latha a Vs the Commissioner

Smt Nagarathna N B Vs the State of Karnataka

Sri. Sanjay Kumar H.S. Vs State of Karnataka

Sri S B Nanjundappa Vs the State of Karnataka

Smt. Sangeetha M Vs the Bruhat Bengaluru Mahanagara Palike