This was a writ petition challenging a notice to vacate premises filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution. Upon the preliminary hearing, the court observed that none of the petitioners appeared. The court held that the petitioners were not interested in prosecuting the matter.
The petition was dismissed for non-prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 18TH DAY OF APRIL, 2023
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE SURAJ GOVINDARAJ WRIT PETITION NO. 43016 OF 2016 (LB-BMP)
BETWEEN:
Digitally signed by NARAYANAPPA LAKSHMAMMA Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
…PETITIONERS
(BY SMT. KAVITHA D, ADVOCATE)
AND:
WP No. 43016 of 2016
…RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. N R JAGADEESWARA, ADVOCATE FOR R1 TO R5)
THIS W.P IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE IMPUGNED NOTICE SATED 1.8.2016 ISSUED BY R-5 CALLING UPON THE PETITIONER TO VACANT AND HAND OVER PHYSICAL POSSESSION OF THE SCHEDULE PREMISES VIDE ANNEXURE-L AND ETC.,
THIS WP, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN 'B' GROUP, THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
ORDER
Despite the order dated 28.03.2023, none appears for the
petitioners today also. It appears that the petitioners are not interested in prosecuting the matter. Hence, the petition stand dismissed for non-prosecution.
Sd/JUDGE
GJM/List No.: 1 Sl No.: 57 CT: BHK
2 provisions across 1 enactments
H. Krishna Prabhu, since deceased by his LRS including Shobitha, Bhavani Amitha, Mahendra Prabhu, Verrendra Prabhu
The Commissioner, Bruhat Bengaluru Mahanagara Palike
Suraj Govindaraj
As recorded by the court registry
2 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
