Disposed¶48

Sri Vinayaka Rural Education Society (R) v. State of Karnataka

Karnataka HC9 Dec 2025WP/15006/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Vinayaka Rural Education Society (R) Gubbi Taluk Tumkuru; Karnataka Societies Registration Act 1960 compliance duty; District Registrar of Societies Tumkuru endorsement dated 28.04.2022 DRT.O.C.4/1963-64; fresh general body meeting / Annual General Meeting; approved resolution on Audit Report; certificate of approval proposal; writ petitions disposed without further orders; Articles 226 and 227 Constitution of India; GM-KSR; High Court of Karnataka; Justice E.S. Indiresh; December 2025.

What did the court decide?

No further orders are required to be made in these writ petitions, as it is the duty of the petitioner-Society to comply with the provisions under the Karnataka Societies Registration Act, 1960. ¶46-47

Sri Vinayaka Rural Education Society (R) Vs State… — Writ and Judicial Review | Karnataka HC (2025)

¶1

NC: 2025:KHC:52796 WP No. 15006 of 2022 C/W WP No. 9658 of 2022

¶2

¶3

HC-KAR

¶4

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 9^TH DAY OF DECEMBER, 2025

¶5

BEFORE

¶6

THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH WRIT PETITION NO.15006 OF 2022 (GM-KSR)

¶7

C/W

¶8

WRIT PETITION NO.9658 OF 2022 (GM-KSR)

¶9

IN WP No.15006/2022

¶10

BETWEEN:

¶11

SRI. VINAYAKA RURAL EDUCATION SOCIETY (R) HAGALVADI POST, GUBBI TALUK TUMKURU DISTRICT - 572 222. REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY REGISTERED UNDER SOCIETY'S REGISTRATION ACT, 1960.

¶12

…PETITIONER

¶13

Digitally signed by ARUNKUMAR M S Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA

¶14

(BY SRI. G.S. PRASANNA KUMAR, ADVOCATE)

¶15

AND:

¶16

STATE OF KARNATAKA

¶17

REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY DEPT. KARNATAKA SOCIETY'S REGISTRATION M.S. BUILDING, VIDHANA VEEDHI, BENGALURU - 560 001.

¶18

2 - NC: 2025:KHC:52796 WP No. 15006 of 2022 C/W WP No. 9658 of 2022

¶19

HC-KAR

¶20

DISTRICT REGISTRAR OF SOCIETIES 2^ND FLOOR,

¶21

MINI VIDHAN SOUDHA TUMKURU - 572 101.

¶22

…RESPONDENTS

¶23

(BY SRI. MAHANTESH SHETTAR, AGA FOR R1 AND R2; R3 TO R7 AND R9 SERVED UNREPRESENTED)

¶24

THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH ENDORSEMENT DTD 28.04.2022 BEARING DRT.O.C.4/1963-64 ANNEXURE-J ISSUED BY THE R2 FOR INSTRUCTING TO CONDUCT FRESH GENERAL BODY MEETING AND FILE REPORT AND ETC.

¶25

IN WP NO. 9658/2022

¶26

BETWEEN:

¶27

SRI. VINAYAKA RURAL EDUACATION SOCIETY (R) HAGALAVADI - 572 222 GUBBI TALUK, TUMKUR DISTRICT REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY.

¶28

...PETITIONER

¶29

(BY SRI. M.C. BASAVARAJU, ADVOCATE)

¶30

3 - NC: 2025:KHC:52796 WP No. 15006 of 2022 C/W WP No. 9658 of 2022

¶31

HC-KAR

¶32

AND:

¶33

THE SECRETARY GOVERNMENT OF KARNATAKA DEPARTMENT OF CO OPERATIVE SOCIETY M.S. BUILDING, DR. AMBEDKAR VEEDI BANGALORE - 560 001.

¶34

THE DISTRICT REGISTRAR OF SOCIETIES AND DEPUTY REGISTRAR OF CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETY, TUMKUR DISTRICT 2^ND FLOOR, MINI VIDHANA SOUDHA TUMKUR - 572 101.

¶35

...RESPONDENTS

¶36

(BY SRI. MAHANTESH SHETTAR, AGA)

¶37

THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASHING THE IMPUGNED ENDORSEMENT DATED 28.04.2022 VIDE ANNEXURE-M TO THIS WRIT PETITION ISSUED BY THE R2.DIRECTING THE R2 TO APPROVE THE PROPOSAL SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONERS SOCIETY AND ISSUE THE CERTIFICATE OF APPROVAL TO THE PETITIONERS SOCIETY AND ETC.,

¶38

THESE PETITIONS, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:

¶39

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH

¶40

4 - NC: 2025:KHC:52796 WP No. 15006 of 2022 C/W WP No. 9658 of 2022

¶41

HC-KAR

¶42

ORAL ORDER

¶43

Heard learned counsel appearing for the parties.

¶44

In these writ petitions, the petitioner is assailing the

¶45

Endorsement dated 28.04.2022 issued by respondent No.2Authority.

¶46

Having taken note of the submission made by the

¶47

learned counsel for the parties, as respondent No.2 has directed the petitioner-Society to conduct the Annual General Meeting and thereafter file approved resolution with regard to the Audit Report of the petitioner-Society and in that view of the matter, I am of the view that no further orders are required to be made in these writ petitions as it is the duty of the petitioner-Society to comply with the provisions under the Karnataka Societies Registration Act, 1960.

¶48

Accordingly, writ petition is disposed of .

¶49

No further orders on pending applications.

¶50

Sd/(E.S.INDIRESH) JUDGE

¶51

SMJ; List No.: 1 Sl No.: 8

Sri Vinayaka Rural Education Society (R) v. State of Karnataka

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sri Vinayaka Rural Education Society (R) v. State of Karnataka

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

M/S Fine Serve Hospitality Services (India) Vs Karnataka State Road Transport Corporation

Mr Chuna Rafi Ahmed Vs the Karnataka State Board

Balaji Warehousing Company Pvt. Ltd. Vs the Chairman and General Manager

Mr B R Krishnamurthy Vs M/S Corporation Bank

Sri Y H Jayakumara Vs the Commissioner

Mrs Nagarathna B M Vs M/S Canara Bank