Dismissed¶44

Dr. Pradeep Kumar Sharma v. State of Karnataka

Karnataka HC20 Jun 2025WP/10220/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Writ petition dismissed (R Devdas, J., 20-06-2025; NC: 2025:KHC:18080; WP No. 10220 of 2024 (LA-KIADB)). Mandamus sought for removal of KIADB and Nandi Infrastructure Corridor Enterprises Limited entries from Revenue Records/RTC (Bangalore South Taluk; Kengeri Hobli; Sy.No.22/1 Kommaghatta Village). Held: remedy for wrong revenue entry lies before the competent authority under the Karnataka Land Revenue Act, not a writ petition; liberty reserved to petitioners. Statutes: Articles 226 & 227, Constitution of India; Karnataka Land Revenue Act.

What did the court decide?

Accepting the contention advanced by the learned Senior Counsel for respondent No.4, the writ petition stands dismissed, while reserving liberty to the petitioners to approach the competent authority under the provisions of the Karnataka Land Revenue Act. ¶44

Dr. Pradeep Kumar Sharma Vs State of Karnataka — Writ and Judicial Review | Karnataka HC (2025)

¶1

¶2

NC: 2025:KHC:18080 WP No. 10220 of 2024

¶3

HC-KAR

¶4

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

¶5

DATED THIS THE 20^TH DAY OF JUNE, 2025

¶6

BEFORE

¶7

THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE R DEVDAS WRIT PETITION NO. 10220 OF 2024 (LA-KIADB)

¶8

BETWEEN:

¶9

DR. PRADEEP KUMAR SHARMA AGED ABOUT 66 YEARS, S/O SRI ILAM CHAND SHARMA R/AT 343, NORTH CIVIL LINE, MUZAFFAR NAGAR, U.P. - 231001.

¶10

MRS. MEENAKSHI SHARMA AGED ABOUT 57 YEARS, W/O DR. PRADEEP SHARMA, R/AT 343, NORTH CIVIL LINE, MUZAFFAR NAGAR, U.P. - 231001.

¶11

…PETITIONERS

¶12

(BY SRI. KANTHARAJA T., ADVOCATE)

¶13

Digitally signed by JUANITA THEJESWINI

¶14

Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA

¶15

AND:

¶16

STATE OF KARNATAKA

¶17

REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY DEPARTMENT OF INDUSTRIES AND COMMERCE, VIKASASOUDHA, BANGALORE - 560001.

¶18

KARNATAKA INDUSTRIAL AREA DEVELOPMENT BOARD KHANIJA BHAVAN, 4^TH & 5^TH FLOOR, RACE COURSE ROAD, BANGALORE – 560001 REP BY ITS CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

¶19

& EXECUTIVE MEMBER

¶20

¶21

NC: 2025:KHC:18080 WP No. 10220 of 2024

¶22

HC-KAR

¶23

THE SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER KIADB (BMICP) 14/3, SRI ARAVINDA BHAVAN 2^ND FLOOR, NRUPATHUNGA ROAD BANGALORE - 560001.

¶24

NANDI INFRASTRUCTURE CORRIDOR ENTERPRISES LIMITED, NO.1, MIDFORD GARDENS OFF MG.ROAD, BANGALORE - 560001

¶25

REP BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR

¶26

THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER FOURTH FLOOR, DC OFFICE BUILDING REVENUE COMPLEX, KEMPEGOWDA ROAD, GANDHI NAGAR, BENGALURU - 560009.

¶27

THE TAHSILDAR BANGALORE SOUTH TALUK KANDAYA BHAVAN, GROUND FLOOR, KEMPEGOWDA ROAD, GANDHI NAGAR, BENGALURU - 560009.

¶28

…RESPONDENTS

¶29

(BY DR. RAVINDRA V REDDY., SPL. COUNSEL FOR R1, R5 & R6 SRI. R.V.S. NAIK., SR. COUNSEL FOR SRI. NITIN PRASAD., ADVOCATE FOR R4 SRI. C. RAMAKRISHNA., ADVOCATE FOR R2 & R3)

¶30

THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 & 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DIRECT R-2 AND 3 TO WITHDRAW ANY PRELIMINARY OR FINAL NOTIFICATION WITH RESPECT TO THE SCHEDULE PROPERTY PRODUCED HERE AS ANNEXURE-A AND DIRECT R-5 AND 6 TO MAKE NECESSARY CHANGES IN THE RTC PRODUCED HERE AS ANNX-A AND ETC.

¶31

THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR FURTHER HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:

¶32

¶33

NC: 2025:KHC:18080 WP No. 10220 of 2024

¶34

HC-KAR

¶35

CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE R DEVDAS

¶36

ORAL ORDER

¶37

The petitioners claim to be the owners of four residential sites measuring about 1200 sq. ft. each in a private layout. The prayer in this writ petition is to issue a writ of mandamus directing the revenue authorities, more particularly, respondent No.6-Tahsildar, Bangalore South Taluk, and respondent No.5-Deputy Commissioner, to remove the entry standing in the name of respondent No.2-KIADB and respondent No.4-Nandi Infrastructure Corridor Enterprises Limited from the Revenue Records.

¶38

Learned Senior Counsel Sri V.S.Naik, appearing for

¶39

respondent No.4 submits that the prayer cannot be granted, having regard to the fact that the acquisition proceedings were initiated at the hands of the respondentState Government for the benefit of respondent No.4 and Nandi Economic Corridor Enterprises limited, of large extent of lands including Sy.No.22/1 of Kommaghatta Village, Kengeri Hobli, Bangalore South Taluk.

¶40

¶41

NC: 2025:KHC:18080 WP No. 10220 of 2024

¶42

HC-KAR

¶43

The petitioners being residential site owners, have nothing to do with the revenue entries. Moreover, it is submitted that if a revenue entry is wrongly recorded, the aggrieved person is required to approach the competent authority under the provisions of the Karnataka Land Revenue Act and a writ petition in this regard cannot be maintained.

¶44

Accepting the contention of the learned Senior Counsel, the writ petition stands dismissed while reserving liberty to the petitioners to approach the competent authority under the provisions of the Karnataka Land

¶45

Revenue Act.

¶46

Ordered accordingly.

¶47

Sd/(R DEVDAS) JUDGE

¶48

JT/CT: JL

Dr. Pradeep Kumar Sharma v. State of Karnataka

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Dr. Pradeep Kumar Sharma v. State of Karnataka

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

M/S Akshay Enterprises Vs Salarpuria Hi Rise Pvt. Ltd.

M/S Fern Builders & Developers Vs Ms. Prathibha D

Sri N Kempaiah Vs Sri a v Srinivas

M/S Sushrutha Vishranthi Dhama Pvt. Ltd., Vs Dr M P Somaprasad

Nandi Infrastructure Corridor Vs the State of Karnataka

Nandi Infrastructure Corridor Vs State Ofkarnataka