Hemantha Gowda v. Smt Ashwini Y v

Karnataka HC21 Jul 2025RPFC/206/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

RPFC 206/2023; Karnataka High Court; Lalitha Kanneganti J.; dismissal for non-prosecution; Section 19(4) Family Court Act; revision against order dated 01.06.2023 in Crl.Misc.No.92/2022, Family Court Chikkamagaluru; petitioner absent on 18.07.2025 and on order date; notice never issued to respondents; no merits decided; no costs awarded.

What did the court decide?

The revision petition is dismissed for non-prosecution: the petitioner made no representation on the date of the order (and none on 18.07.2025), indicating that he is not interested in pursuing the matter. ¶35-36

Hemantha Gowda Vs Smt Ashwini Y v — Karnataka HC (2025) — LawSathi Research

¶1

¶2

NC: 2025:KHC:27664 RPFC No. 206 of 2023

¶3

HC-KAR

¶4

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

¶5

DATED THIS THE 21^ST DAY OF JULY, 2025

¶6

BEFORE

¶7

THE HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE LALITHA KANNEGANTI REV.PET FAMILY COURT NO. 206 OF 2023

¶8

BETWEEN:

¶9

HEMANTHA GOWDA AGED 30 YEARS, S/O NANJE GOWDA, R/O MUTTUGADALU, AREHALLI HOBLI, IRAVALLI POST, BELUR TALUK, HASSAN DISTRICT-573 115.

¶10

…PETITIONER

¶11

(BY SRI. ANANTHA NARAYANA B.N., ADVOCATE (ABSENT))

¶12

AND:

¶13

SMT. ASHWINI Y.V. AGED ABOUT 26 YEARS, W/O HEMANTH GOWDA,

¶14

ARNA

¶15

Digitally signed by LAKSHMI T Location: High Court of Karnataka

¶16

AGED ABOUT 04 YEARS, D/O HEMANTHA GOWDA, SINCE MINOR, REPRESENTED BY HIS MOTHER AS NATURAL GUARDIAN, SMT. ASHWINI Y.V.,

¶17

1 & 2 BOTH ARE RESIDENTS OF MALALUR VILLAGE AND POST, CHIKKAMAGALURU TALUK, CHIKKAMAGALURU DISTRICT-577 101.

¶18

…RESPONDENTS

¶19

(R2 IS MINOR REPRESENTED BY R1)

¶20

2 - NC: 2025:KHC:27664 RPFC No. 206 of 2023

¶21

HC-KAR

¶22

THIS RPFC IS FILED UNDER SECTION 19(4) OF FAMILY COURT ACT, PRAYING TO CALL FOR THE TRIAL COURT RECORDS AND THE ORDER DATED 01.06.2023 PASSED IN CRL.MISC.NO.92/2022 ON THE FILE OF THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL JUDGE, FAMILY COURT, CHIKKAMAGALURU, BE SET ASIDE AND THE SAID PETITION FILED BY THE RESPONDENTS BE DISMISSED BY ALLOWING THE ABOVE REVISION PETITON WITH COSTS.

¶23

THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:

¶24

CORAM: HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE LALITHA KANNEGANTI

¶25

ORAL ORDER

¶26

The RPFC is of the year 2023. Till now, no steps are

¶27

taken for issuance of notice to the respondents.

¶28

When the matter was listed on 18.7.2025, as there

¶29

was no representation on behalf of both the parties and no notice is served on the respondents, the matter was directed to be listed under the caption for 'dismissal' today.

¶30