Dismissed¶42

Reyaz Pasha v. Smt Nigar Sulthana

Karnataka HC18 Jul 2025RPFC/209/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

RPFC No. 209 of 2022, High Court of Karnataka (Bengaluru), decided 18.07.2025 by Justice Lalitha Kanneganti. Petitioner: Reyaz Pasha (counsel P. B. Raju); Respondents: Nigar Sulthana and minors Raziya Kausar, Saheema Kausar, Zaina Kausar. Challenge under S.19(4) Family Court Act to Family Court, Kolar order dated 13.07.2022 in Crl.Misc.No.98/2020 partly allowing S.125 Cr.P.C maintenance. Outcome: petition dismissed on 18.07.2025 for non-compliance with office objections after expiry of one week's grace time. Statutes: S.19(4) Family Court Act; S.125 Cr.P.C. No precedents engaged.

What did the court decide?

A week's time was granted to do the needful, failing which the petition would stand dismissed without reference to the Court. ¶40

Reyaz Pasha Vs Smt Nigar Sulthana — Maintenance and Alimony | Karnataka HC (2025)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 18^TH DAY OF JULY 2025

¶2

BEFORE

¶3

THE HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE LALITHA KANNEGANTI

¶4

RPFC NO. 209 OF 2022

¶5

BETWEEN

¶6

SRI REYAZ PASHA,

¶7

(WRONGLY MENTIONED AT SYED RIYAZ, IN CRL. MISC. 98/2022),

¶8

SON OF SRI KHADAR SAB,

¶9

AGED ABOUT 44 YEARS,

¶10

RESIDING AT AMBEDKAR COLONY,

¶11

A. R. BADRAVANI,HOSKOTE,

¶12

BENGLAURU RURAL - 562 114.

¶13

(WRONGLY MENTIONED IN CRL. MISC NO. 98/2020 AS)

¶14

REAL ESTATE BUSINESS AND

¶15

ALSO OWNER OF PROVISION STORE

¶16

KATMANDU LAYOUT,

¶17

V. V. EXTENSION,

¶18

NANDASRI ROAD, HOSKOTE - 563 1140.

¶19

...PETITIONER/S

¶20

(By SRI/SMT. : P. B. RAJU, ADVOCATE)

¶21

AND

¶22

1 . SMT. NIGAR SULTHANA, D/O RAFIULLA KHAN, W/O SYED RIYAZ,

…2

RPFC NO. 209 of 2022

AGED 36 YEARS,

2 . RAZIYA KAUSAR, D/O SYED RIYAZ, AGED ABOUT 14 YEARS MINOR,

¶28

3 . SAHEEMA KAUSAR, S/O SYED RIYAZ, AGED ABOUT 11 YEARS MINOR,

¶29

4 . ZAINA KAUSAR, D/O SYED RIYAZ, AGED ABOUT 5 YEARS MINOR

¶30

RESPONDENTS 2 TO 4 ARE MINORS AND HENCE REPRESENTED BY NATURAL GUARDIAN/MOTHER THE RESPONDENT NO. 1

¶31

RESPONDENTS 1 TO 4 ARE RESIDING AT 4^TH CROSS, S. A. BUILDING, SHAINSHA NAGAR, KOLAR - 563 102. ...RESPONDENT/S

¶32

RPFC FILED UNDER SECTION 19(4) OF THE FAMILY COURT ACT, AGAINST THE ORDER DATED 13.07.2022 PASSED IN

…3

RPFC NO. 209 of 2022

CRL.MISC.NO.98/2020 ON THE FILE OF THE PRINCIPAL JUDGE, FAMILY COURT, KOLAR, PARTLY ALLOWING THE PETITION FILED UNDER SECTION 125 OF Cr.P.C FOR MAINTENANCE.

¶37

This RPFC coming on for Orders, this day the Court made the following Order.

¶38

ORAL ORDER

¶39

A week's time is granted to do the needful. By the time, if

¶40

the needful is not done, the petition shall stand dismissed without reference to the Court.

¶41

Sd/JUSTICE LALITHA KANNEGANTI

¶42

NOTE : Vide Court Order dated 18.07.2025, office objections are not complied with. Hence, the petition is hereby dismissed.