Dismissed¶30

T Manjunatha v. Suma M T

Karnataka HC21 Jul 2025RPFC/159/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

RPFC 159/2021, Karnataka High Court, order dated 21-07-2025, Lalitha Kanneganti J.; dismissal for non-prosecution; petitioner absent on repeated listings; notice never issued since 2021 filing; petition under S.19(4) Family Courts Act 1984 to set aside Family Court Shivamogga C.Mis.No.152/2017 decree dated 27.08.2021; no merits adjudicated; no cases relied upon.

What did the court decide?

Despite the revision petition having been filed in 2021, no steps were taken for issuance of notice to the respondent, and there was again no representation for the petitioner when the matter was called; hence the petitioner appears not interested to pursue the matter. ¶29

T Manjunatha Vs Suma M T — Karnataka HC (2025) — LawSathi Research

¶1

¶2

NC: 2025:KHC:28443 RPFC No. 159 of 2021

¶3

HC-KAR

¶4

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

¶5

DATED THIS THE 21^ST DAY OF JULY, 2025

¶6

BEFORE

¶7

THE HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE LALITHA KANNEGANTI REV.PET FAMILY COURT NO. 159 OF 2021

¶8

BETWEEN:

¶9

T. MANJUNATHA S/O GURUBASAPPA, AGED ABOUT 44 YEARS, R/AT NO.429, 11^TH CROSS, RASHI RESIDENCE,KADABAGERE, BANGALORE-562 130. PH 9632182789.

¶10

…PETITIONER

¶11

(BY SMT. D.N. MAMATA, ADVOCATE (ABSENT))

¶12

AND:

¶13

SUMA M.T. W/O T. MANJUNATHA, AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS,

¶14

2. BHOOMIKA

¶15

Digitally signed by LAKSHMI T Location: High Court of Karnataka

¶16

(SINCE MINOR REPRESENTED BY MOTHER SUMA M.T.) D/O T. MANJUNATHA, AGED ABOUT 6 YEARS,

¶17

SAMARTHA

¶18

(SINCE MINOR REPRESENTED BY MOTHER SUMA M.T.) D/O T. MANJUNATHA, AGED ABOUT 6 YEARS,

¶19

RESPONDENT 1-3 ARE R/AT NO.4/1, CLERK PETE, K.R. PURAM, KARNATAKA, SHIVAMOGGA DISTRICT, SHIVAMOGGA-577 202. PH 910869966.

¶20

…RESPONDENTS

¶21

2 - NC: 2025:KHC:28443 RPFC No. 159 of 2021

¶22

HC-KAR

¶23

THIS RPFC FILED UNDER SEC.19(4) OF THE FAMILY COURTS ACT, 1984, PRAYING TO (A) SET ASIDE THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE PASSED BY THE PRINCIPAL JUDGE, FAMILY COURT AT SHIVAMOGGA IN C.MIS.NO.152/2017 DATED 27.08.2021 AND ETC.

¶24

THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:

¶25

CORAM: HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE LALITHA KANNEGANTI

¶26

ORAL ORDER

¶27

The RPFC is of the year 2021. Till now, no steps are taken for issuance of notice to the respondent.

¶28

When the matter was listed on 18.7.2025, as there was no representation on behalf of both the parties and no notice is served on the respondent, the matter was directed to be listed under the caption for 'dismissal' today.

¶29

Today also, there is no representation on behalf of the petitioner. Hence, it appears that the petitioner is not interested to pursue the matter.

¶30

Accordingly, the petition is dismissed for non-prosecution.

¶31

Sd/(LALITHA KANNEGANTI) JUDGE

¶32

TL / List No.: 1 Sl No.: 31

T Manjunatha v. Suma M T

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

T Manjunatha v. Suma M T

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Sri Praveen Kumar L S Vs Smt. Deepika S

D G Shivaprasad Vs Bhavya D M

Reyaz Pasha Vs Smt Nigar Sulthana

Hemantha Gowda Vs Smt Ashwini Y v

Sri. Mohammed Inayatulla Khan (Tahreem) Vs Smt. Sufiya

Sri a M Biddappa Vs Smt a B Kasthuri