Disposed

Smt Saritha v. the State of Karnataka

Karnataka HC20 Aug 2024WP/9686/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The petitioner challenged the respondent panchayat's refusal to issue an NOC for a petrol bunk. The court directed the respondent to consider the petitioner's representation within one month if conditions are met.

What did the court decide?

Directed respondent No. 2 to consider the representation dated 07.02.2024 for issuance of NOC within one month provided petitioner fulfills conditions.

Smt Saritha Vs the State of Karnataka — Property and Title | Karnataka HC (2024)

¶1

1 - NC: 2024:KHC:33459 WP No. 9686 of 2024

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

¶3

DATED THIS THE 20^TH DAY OF AUGUST, 2024

¶4

BEFORE

¶5

THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE ASHOK S.KINAGI WRIT PETITION NO. 9686 OF 2024 (LB-RES)

¶6

BETWEEN:

¶7

SMT. SARITHA, W/O LATE G. VINOD BABU, AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS, R/AT NO.S6, 52ND CROSS, 4TH BLOCK, RAJAJINAGAR, BENGALURU - 560 010.

¶8

…PETITIONER

¶9

(BY SRI. S. KALYAN BASAVARAJ, ADVOCATE)

¶10

AND:

¶11

Digitally signed by R DEEPA Location: High Court of Karnataka

¶12

THE STATE OF KARNATAKA, HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT, ROOM NO.431, IV FLOOR, VIKAS SOUDHA, DR. AMBEDKAR VEEDHI, BENGALURU - 560 001, REPRESENTED BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY.

¶13

THE PANCHAYAT DEVELOPMENT OFFICER, BADDIKODIGEHALLI GRAMA PANCHAYAT, BADDIKODIGEHALLI VILLAGE, JALA HOBLI, BENGALURU NORTH (ADDL.) TALUK, BENGALURU - 562 149.

¶14

THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER, BENGALURU URBAN DISTRICT, BENGALURU - 560 001.

¶15

THE TERRITORY MANAGER (RETAIL), BHARAT PETROLEUM CORPORATION LIMITED,

¶16

¶17

NC: 2024:KHC:33459 WP No. 9686 of 2024

¶18

DU PONT TRINITY, 7TH FLOOR, M.G. ROAD, BENGALURU - 560 001.

¶19

…RESPONDENTS

¶20

(BY SRI. H.K. KENCHEGOWDA, AGA FOR R1 AND R3; SRI. PRADEEP M, ADVOCATE FOR R2; R4 NOTICE STAND DISPENSED WITH VIDE ORDER DATED 22.04.2024)

¶21

THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DIRECT THE R2 TO CONSIDER THE REPRESENTATION DATED 07/02/2024 FOR ISSUANCE NOC FOR THE PURPOSES OF PUTTING UP PETROL BUNK IN PROPERTY BEARING SY. NO. 74/323, BADDIKODIGEHALLI VILLAGE, JALA HOBLI, BENGALURU NORTH TALUK, BENGALURU - 562 149, PRODUCED AT ANNEXURE-A.

¶22

THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:

¶23

CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE ASHOK S.KINAGI

¶24

ORAL ORDER

¶25

The petitioner has filed this petition seeking for a writ of mandamus to consider the representation dated 07.02.2024 for issuance of NOC for the purpose of establishing the petrol bunk.

¶26

Learned counsel for respondent No.2 submits that if reasonable time is granted to respondent No.2, respondent No.2 will consider the representation of the petitioner in accordance with law. Submission is placed on record.

¶27

3 - NC: 2024:KHC:33459 WP No. 9686 of 2024

¶28

Respondent No.2 agreed to consider the

¶29

representation.

¶30

In view of the same, the writ petition is disposed of directing respondent No.2 to consider the representation dated 07.02.2024 provided if the petitioner fulfills the conditions imposed by the competent authority, in accordance with law within a period of one month from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

¶31

Sd/(ASHOK S.KINAGI) JUDGE

¶32

GJM

¶33

List No.: 1 Sl No.: 30 CT: BHK

Smt Saritha v. the State of Karnataka

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Smt Saritha v. the State of Karnataka

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

M/S Radiant Structures Private Limited Vs Sri N Ramachandra Reddy

Sri. Krishnappa @ M.V. Krishnegowda Vs the State of Karnataka

Smt Varsha Jadhav Vs Bruhath Bengaluru Mahanagara Palike

T. Nagappa Vs the Deputy Commissisoner

Sri Appajigowda Vs Sri Doreswamy Gowda

Smt Lingamma @ Doddathayamma Vs H C Krishne Gowda