Petitioner challenged an order issued by the Taluk Municipality. During hearing, the Municipality's counsel stated on instructions that it would withdraw the impugned order; nothing survived and the writ petition was disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 20TH DAY OF AUGUST, 2024
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE ASHOK S.KINAGI WRIT PETITION NO. 2844 OF 2022 (LB-RES)
BETWEEN:
…PETITIONER
(BY SRI. MAMATHA M R., ADVOCATE)
AND:
Digitally signed by KIRAN KUMAR R Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
…RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. H.K.KENCHEGOWDA, AGA FOR R-1; NAGARAJ.S.JAIN FOR R-2)
THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO QUASH THE IMPUGNED ORDER DATED 4.12.2020 FOUND AT ANNEXURE-E, ISSUED BY THE R2, ETC.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
NC: 2024:KHC:33344 WP No. 2844 of 2022
CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE ASHOK S.KINAGI
ORAL ORDER
disposed of .
Sd/(ASHOK S.KINAGI) JUDGE
HNM
List No.: 1 Sl No.: 20
1 provisions across 1 enactments
T. Nagappa
The Deputy Commissioner Bengaluru District
Taluk Municipality Anekal Taluk
Ashok S.Kinagi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
