A party-in-person's writ petition seeking quashing of maintenance-related court orders remained uncomplied with office objections since 2018 and drew no representation on two listing dates. With the petitioner absent again, the High Court dismissed it for non-prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
NC: 2024:KHC:31165 WP No. 9514 of 2018
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 6TH DAY OF AUGUST, 2024
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE LALITHA KANNEGANTI WRIT PETITION NO. 9514 OF 2018 (GM-FC)
BETWEEN:
D.S. ARAVIND, S/O. LATE D.V.S.N. RAO, AGED ABOUT 67 YEARS, PARTY-IN-PERSON, NO.440, OUT HOUSE (GROUND FLOOR) & IST FLOOR, 13TH MAIN, M.C.R. LAYOUT, VIJAYANAGAR, BENGALURU - 560 040.
…PETITIONER
(BY SRI. D.S. ARAVIND, PARTY IN PERSON)
AND:
Digitally signed by MEGHA MOHAN
Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
ALL OF THEM ARE R/O.NO.440, FRONT HOUSE(GROUND FLOOR), 13TH MAIN, M.C.R. LAYOUT, VIJAYANAGAR,
NC: 2024:KHC:31165 WP No. 9514 of 2018
BANGALORE - 560 040.
…RESPONDENTS
THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA BY PARTY-IN-PERSON PRAYING TO QUASH THE IMPUGNED ORDERS IN THE AFORESAID THREE CASES C.MIS.NO.736/2015, 737/2015 AND C.MIS.NO. 607/2016 DATED 08.01.2018 BEING COMMON JUDGMENT IN ALL THE THREE HAS BEEN PASSED WITH ABUSE OF DUE PROCESS OF LAW IN POST HASTE HURRIED MANNER THOUGH THE RESPONDENTS HAVE NOT FILED THEIR OBJECTIONS WITHIN 2 DAYS OF APPLICATION OF THE PETITIONER DATED 6.1.2018 BEING ABORTIVE TRIAL AND ISSUING ATTACHMENT ORDERS ON 10.01.2018 IS EXPLICIT AS PER (AS PER ANNEX-i PAGE NO.430) THOUGH AS PER THE ORDER SHEET (AS PER ANNEX-C PAGE NO.28) THOUGH THE CASE WAS POSTED ON 20.02.2018 FOR FLW IS ABUSIVE DUE PROCESS OF LAW THOUGH THE PETITIONER PRAYER NOT TO WITHDRAW THE MONEY DEPOSITED IN THE TREASURY BENCH BY THE RESPONDENTS TIME UP TO 4.4.2018 WAS GRANTED BY THE TRIAL COURT AS THEY BY PLAYING FRAUD IN THIS HONBLE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA ALSO AS BY PLAYING FRAUD ON THE TRIAL COURT ALSO THEY HAVE GOT ORDERS BY PLAYING FRAUD BY SUPPRESSION OF TRUE FACTS GOT THE JUDGMENT AND ARE ILLEGALLY CLAIMING MAINTENANCE FROM THE PETITIONER PALTRY SUM OF RS.400/- P.M. THROUGH THEIR GRAND SON IS EARNING RS. 40,000/- P.M. BEING INFOSYS EMPLOYEE AS PER (AS PER ANNEX-Y PAGE NO. 284-285) WITH AN INTENSION TO DISGORGEMENT OF GAINS TO WRONGDOERS FOR PERJURY, FABRICATED FALSEHOOD, SWEARING ON OATH FALSEHOOD WITHOUT CUSTODIAL EGIS OF ORIGINAL TITLE DEEDS AND TENDS TO SCANDALIZE THAT THEY WOULD PAY FULL RESTITUTION, MESNE PROFITS AT MARKET RATE AND ACTUAL COSTS AND THEY SHOULD BE ADEQUATELY PUNISHED PROSECUTED FOR VENTURING IN MIS-APPROPRIATION AND ETC.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR DISMISSAL, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
NC: 2024:KHC:31165 WP No. 9514 of 2018
CORAM: HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE LALITHA KANNEGANTI
ORAL ORDER
This Writ Petition is of the year 2018. The office has raised as many as 31 objections and the same were not complied with. This matter came up on 31.07.2024. As there was no representation by the party in person, this matter was directed to be listed for today under the caption ‘for dismissal’.
prosecution .
SD/(LALITHA KANNEGANTI) JUDGE
BN
List No.: 1 Sl No.: 1
2 provisions across 1 enactments
D.S. Aravind
D. S. Uma Devi
D. S. Ram Mohan
Radhika R. Shenoy
Lalitha Kanneganti
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
