A 2014 writ petition under Article 227 seeking interim restraints concerning a second marriage and property alienation pending in family court remained unprosecuted despite notice to the party-in-person. The court found the petitioner not interested in pursuing the matter and dismissed the petition for non-prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
NC: 2024:KHC:30983 WP No. 31581 of 2014
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 5TH DAY OF AUGUST, 2024
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE LALITHA KANNEGANTI WRIT PETITION NO. 31581 OF 2014 (GM-FC)
BETWEEN:
SMT.ASHWINI C D/O CHANDRASHEKAR, AGED ABOUT 28 YEARS, R/O # NO-21, 3RD CROSS, NANDINI LAYOUT, BANGALORE-96.
…PETITIONER
(BY SRI. ASHWINI C .,- PARTY IN PERSON- ABSENT)
AND:
Digitally signed by MEGHA MOHAN
Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
SRI.VENKATARAVANAPPA V., S/O LATE VENKATARAYAPPA, AGED ABOUT 30 YEARS, (CAMP) PAPATHIMANAHALLI, CHIKKABALLAPURA DISTRICT, KARNATAKA.
…RESPONDENT
THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO (1).THE AFFIDAVIT EVIDENCE I.A. NO-1 RESTRAIN THE SECOND MARRIAGE BY THE RESPONDENT/PETITIONER SHOULD BE STRICTED AND STAYED BY ALLOWING THE I.A. NO-01. (2). THE AFFIDAVIT EVIDENCE I.A. NO-2 OF THE APPELLANT/RESPONDENT FOR NECESSARY ORDERS RESTRAINING THE ALIENATION OF THE PROPERTY TO THE RESPONDENT/PETITIONER TILL THE DISPOSAL OF THE CASE IN FAMILY COURT. SINCE THE SHARE OF THE APPELLANT/ RESPONDENT WILL GO.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR FINAL HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE LALITHA KANNEGANTI
NC: 2024:KHC:30983 WP No. 31581 of 2014
ORAL ORDER
This writ petition is of the year 2014 and the matter is
still pending for compliance of office objections.
the same to the party-in-person. As per the office note, they have communicated the same and he has not responded and the notice is also sent. Hence, it appears that the party-inperson is not interested to pursue the matter.
SD/(LALITHA KANNEGANTI) JUDGE
MEG List No.: 1 Sl No.: 1
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the writ petition pending since 2014 for non-compliance of office objections should be prosecuted where the party-in-person is absent and unresponsive.
Smt. Ashwini C D/o Chandrashekar
Sri. Venkataravanappa V.
Lalitha Kanneganti
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
