Writ petition against a family court interlocutory order; counsel filed a memo stating the main matrimonial case stands disposed of, making the petition infructuous. The High Court dismissed the writ petition as infructuous and closed all pending interlocutory applications.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
NC: 2024:KHC:38156 WP No. 7274 of 2020
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 17TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2024
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE LALITHA KANNEGANTI WRIT PETITION NO. 7274 OF 2020 (GM-FC)
BETWEEN:
SRI. B.V SURENDRA, S/O. M. VENKATASWAMY, AGED ABOUT 39 YEARS, R/AT NO.86, 4TH MAIN, BEHIND MARUTHI ALPYNE APARTMENTS, BDA LAYOUT, BANASHANKARI 5TH STAGE, BANGALORE-560061.
…PETITIONER
(BY SRI. THYAGARAJA B., ADVOCATE)
AND:
Digitally signed by SUVARNA T Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
SMT. N.S NANDINI, W/O. B.V SURENDRA, D/O. N.R SADASHIVA, AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS, R/AT SANTHE GATE, BETHAMANGALA, KOLAR-563116.
(BY SRI. CHANDRASHEKAR P.,ADVOCATE)
…RESPONDENT
THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO QUASH THE ORDER DATED 06.11.2019 PASSED BY THE HON’BLE III ADDL. PRINCIPAL JUDGE FAMILY COURT AT BENGALURU IN M.C.NO.4155/2016 ON I.A-V VIDE ANNEXURE-E, ETC.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN ‘B’ GROUP, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
NC: 2024:KHC:38156 WP No. 7274 of 2020
CORAM: HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE LALITHA KANNEGANTI
ORAL ORDER
Learned counsel for the petitioner has filed a memo
stating that the main M.C. itself is disposed off. Hence, the Writ Petition has become infructuous. Memo is taken on record.
infructuous .
SD/(LALITHA KANNEGANTI) JUDGE
BN
List No.: 1 Sl No.: 6
Sri. B.V Surendra
Smt. N.S Nandini
Lalitha Kanneganti
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
