Petitioner filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 seeking direction to register an FIR based on a complaint. The court directed respondents to consider the complaint and take action within six weeks.
Respondents directed to consider the complaint dated 29.01.2024 and take necessary steps within six weeks.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
NC: 2024:KHC:21764 WP No. 4628 of 2024
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 18TH DAY OF JUNE, 2024
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE S.R.KRISHNA KUMAR WRIT PETITION NO. 4628 OF 2024 (GM-POLICE)
BETWEEN:
BYLAPPA M B S/O LATE BYLAIAH AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS, R/AT NO.5TH CROSS, SRIRAMANAGARA TUMAKURU TOWN TUMAKURU-572 103.
…PETITIONER
(BY SRI. SHARAN N MAJAGE.,ADVOCATE)
AND:
Digitally signed by Vandana S Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
…RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI.K.S. HARISH, GOVERNMENT ADVOCATE)
THIS W.P IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DIRECTING THE R3 TO REGISTER THE FIRST INFORMATION REPORT IN PURSUANCE OF THE COMPLAINT
NC: 2024:KHC:21764 WP No. 4628 of 2024
DATED 29/01/2024. COPY WHICH ARE PRODUCED AT ANNEXURE-A AND B.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN ‘B’ GROUP, THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
ORDER
In this petition, petitioner seeks for the following reliefs:-
“ a) Issue a writ of Mandamus or any other Writ, or direction, directing the 3rd respondent to register the First Information Report in pursuance of the Complaint dated: 29.01.2024. Copy which are produced at Annexure-A & B respectively.
b) Issue such other writ order or directions as this Hon’ble Court deems fit to be granted in the facts and circumstances of the case including the cost of this petition allowing this Petition , in the interest of justice and equity.”
NC: 2024:KHC:21764 WP No. 4628 of 2024
respondents submits that if reasonable time is given, they would consider and pass necessary orders on the said representation.
of.
Sd/JUDGE
Srl.
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Lalitha Kumari Vs. the Government of Uttar Pradesh and othersReferred¶5
Lalitha Kumari Vs. the Government of Uttar Pradesh and others – (2014) 2 SCC 1 · Who else cites this
2 provisions across 1 enactments
BYLAPPA M B S/O LATE BYLAIAH
THE STATE OF KARNATAKA
SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE
SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE JAYANAGARA
S.R.KRISHNA KUMAR
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
