Disposed

Sri. Venkatesha v. the State of Karnataka

Karnataka HC17 Dec 2024WP/34145/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Landowner's writ petition seeking consideration of his representation for enhanced compensation in terms of orders cited in the representation. The court directed respondent Nos.2 to 5 to consider the representation dated 15.12.2023 within three months and disposed of the petition.

What did the court decide?

Respondents 2 to 5 directed to consider petitioner's representation dated 15.12.2023 within three months from receipt of certified copy of the order.

Sri. Venkatesha Vs the State of Karnataka — Land Acquisition | Karnataka HC (2024)

¶1

1 - NC: 2024:KHC:51944 WP No. 34145 of 2024

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

¶3

DATED THIS THE 17^TH DAY OF DECEMBER, 2024

¶4

BEFORE

¶5

THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH WRIT PETITION NO.34145 OF 2024 (LA-RES)

¶6

BETWEEN:

¶7

SRI. VENKATESHA S/O LATE THIMME GOWDA @ LATE D.GUNDE GOWDA AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS RESIDING AT NO.328 BELUR ROAD, NEAR INCOME TAX OFFICE VIJAYANAGAR EXTENSION 2^ND STAGE HASSAN - 573 201.

¶8

…PETITIONER

¶9

(BY SRI. SURESH BABU B.N., ADVOCATE)

¶10

AND:

¶11

Digitally signed by SHARMA ANAND CHAYA Location: High

¶12

Court of Karnataka

¶13

THE STATE OF KARNATAKA DEPARTMENT OF MINOR IRRIGATION VIDHANA SOUDHA DR. B.R. AMBEDKAR VEEDHI, BENGALURU - 560 001

¶14

REPRSENTED BY ITS PRICNIPAL SECRETARY.

¶15

THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER HASSAN DISTRICT HASSAN - 573 201.

¶16

THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER CUM LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER HASSAN SUB DIVISION

¶17

HASSAN - 573 201.

¶18

¶19

NC: 2024:KHC:51944 WP No. 34145 of 2024

¶20

THE SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER H.R.P-2, OFFICE OF THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER I FLOOR HASSAN - 573 201.

¶21

THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER YAGACHI PROJECT DIVISION BELUR - 576 111.

¶22

…RESPONDENTS

¶23

(BY SRI. MANJUNATH K., HCGP)

¶24

THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DIRECT THE RESPONDENTS NO.2 TO 5 TO CONSIDER THE REQUEST OF THE PETITIONER DATED 15.12.2023 WHICH IS PRODUCED AND MARKED AS ANNEXURE-E TO THE WRIT PETITION.

¶25

THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY

¶26

HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH

¶27

ORAL ORDER

¶28

Heard learned counsel appearing for the parties.

¶29

In this writ petition, the grievance of the petitioner is with regard to non consideration of the representation made by the petitioner dated 15.12.2023(Annexure-E), seeking enhanced compensation in terms of the order referred to by the petitioner

¶30

¶31

NC: 2024:KHC:51944 WP No. 34145 of 2024

¶32

at paragraph Nos.4 and 5 of the representation produced at Annexure-E to the Writ Petition.

¶33

In that view of the matter, respondent Nos.2 to 5 are hereby directed to consider the representation dated 15.12.2023, within three months from the date of receipt of certified copy of this Order.

¶34

With this observation, the Writ Petition is disposed of.

¶35

SD/(E.S.INDIRESH) JUDGE

¶36

sac List No.: 1 Sl No.: 18

Sri. Venkatesha v. the State of Karnataka

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sri. Venkatesha v. the State of Karnataka

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

M/S Petronet Mhb Ltd. Vs Sri Rajanna

Sri Rajanna P Vs the Deputy Commissioner

Late M C Leela Vs the State of Karnataka

B v Janardhan Vs the Special Land Acquisition Officer

Sri Bandi Ningegowda Vs Mysore Urban Development Authority

Sri S. Raman Sastry @ S. Raman Vs the Commissioner