Disposed

Smt. Jayamma v. the Mysore Urban Development Authority

Karnataka HC16 Dec 2024WP/33929/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Landowners sought compensation under the 2013 land acquisition Act for their Mysuru land taken by MUDA. The court directed the authority to consider their representation dated 03.08.2024 in accordance with law and disposed of the writ petition without expressing any opinion on merits.

What did the court decide?

Respondents directed to consider the representation dated 03.08.2024 in accordance with law.

Smt. Jayamma Vs the Mysore Urban Development Authority — Land Acquisition | Karnataka HC (2024)

¶1

¶2

NC: 2024:KHC:51719 WP No. 33929 of 2024

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 16^TH DAY OF DECEMBER, 2024

¶4

BEFORE

¶5

THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH WRIT PETITION NO. 33929 OF 2024 (LA-RES)

¶6

BETWEEN:

¶7

SMT. JAYAMMA W/O LATE SHIVANNA, AGED ABOUT 64 YEARS RESIDING AT NO. 2378 4^TH CROSS, 5^TH MAIN, VINAYAKANAGAR, MYSURU - 570012.

¶8

SMT. SHARADA S., D/O LATE SHIVANNA, AGED ABOUT 36 YEARS, RESIDING AT NO. 2378, 4^TH CROSS, 5^TH MAIN, VINAYAKANAGAR, MYSURU - 570 012.

¶9

Digitally signed by VEERENDRA KUMAR K M Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA

¶10

SMT. SHILPA S., D/O LATE SHIVANNA, AGED ABOUT 34 YEARS RESIDING AT NO. 2378, 4^TH CROSS, 5^TH MAIN, VINAYAKANAGAR, MYSURU - 570 012.

¶11

…PETITIONERS

¶12

(BY SRI N.KUMAR, ADVOCATE)

¶13

AND:

¶14

THE MYSORE URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY J.L.B.ROAD, MYSURU - 570 001. REPRESENTED BY ITS COMMISSIONER.

¶15

¶16

NC: 2024:KHC:51719 WP No. 33929 of 2024

¶17

THE LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER MYSORE URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, J.L.B.ROAD, MYSURU - 570 001.

¶18

…RESPONDENTS

¶19

(BY SRI T.P.VIVEKANANDA, ADVOCATE)

¶20

THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DIRECT THE RESPONDENTS TO PAY COMPENSATION IN RESPECT OF LAND BEARING SY.NO. 42/3 MEASURING 01 ACRE 27 GUNTAS, SITUATED AT PADUVARAHALLI VILLAGE, KASABA HOBLI, MYSURU TALUK, BELONGING TO THE PETITIONER AS PER RIGHT TO FAIR COMPENSATION AND TRANSPARENCY IN LAND ACQUISITION, REHABILITATION AND RESETTLEMENT ACT, 2013.

¶21

THIS WRIT PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:

¶22

CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH

¶23

ORAL ORDER

¶24

Sri. T.P. Vivekananda, learned counsel accepts

¶25

notice for the respondents.

¶26

In this writ petition the grievance of the petitioner

¶27

is that the land belonging to the petitioner to an extent of 1 acre 27 guntas situate at Paduvarahalli village, Mysuru

¶28

Taluk has been acquired by the respondent / authorities and thereby, the petitioner has approached the respondent/authorities by way of representation at

¶29

3 - NC: 2024:KHC:51719 WP No. 33929 of 2024

¶30

Annexure ‘D’ dated 03.08.2024, seeking the benefits as stated in the said representation.

¶31

In that view of the matter, I am of the view that the respondent herein shall consider the representation dated 03.08.2024 in accordance with law. It is made clear that this court has not expressed any opinion on the merits of the matter.

¶32

Accordingly writ petition is disposed of.

¶33

SD/(E.S.INDIRESH) JUDGE

¶34

SD List No.: 1 Sl No.: 22

Smt. Jayamma v. the Mysore Urban Development Authority

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Smt. Jayamma v. the Mysore Urban Development Authority

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Sri T Krishnamurthy Vs the State of Karnataka

Mrs. Nayan Taj Vs the Commissioner

Sri Muddaiah Vs State of Karnataka

Sri Basavarajappa Vs the State of Karnataka

Sri Doddanna Vs State of Karnataka

Mr Rangaswamy Babu Vs Bengaluru Development Authority