Disposed

Mr Rangaswamy Babu v. Bengaluru Development Authority

Karnataka HC16 Dec 2024WP/33919/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Petitioners sought a direction to BDA to convey Site No. 110A in Koramangala IV 'B' Block pursuant to a 2005 confirmation letter. The court directed BDA to consider their representation dated 08.10.2024 within four months without expressing any opinion on merits.

What did the court decide?

BDA directed to consider representation dated 8.10.2024 (Annexure L-5) within four months.

Mr Rangaswamy Babu Vs Bengaluru Development Authority — Property and Title | Karnataka HC (2024)

¶1

¶2

NC: 2024:KHC:51715 WP No. 33919 of 2024

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 16^TH DAY OF DECEMBER, 2024

¶4

BEFORE

¶5

THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH WRIT PETITION NO. 33919 OF 2024 (BDA)

¶6

BETWEEN:

¶7

MR. RANGASWAMY BABU SON OF V.RANGASWAMY AGED ABOUT 59 YEARS

¶8

MRS. VIDHYA SHANKARI WIFE OF MR.RANGASWAMY BABU AGED ABOUT 56 YEARS

¶9

BOTH ARE RESIDING AT NO. 301 T-ZED HOMES, VARTHUR MAIN ROAD, WHITEFIELD, BENGALURU - 560 066.

¶10

…PETITIONERS

¶11

(BY SRI NEERAJ SASTRY, ADVOCATE)

¶12

Digitally signed by VEERENDRA KUMAR K M Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA

¶13

AND:

¶14

BENGALURU DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY AN AUTHORITY CONSTITUTED UNDER THE BENGALURU DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY ACT, 1976 HAVING REGISTERED OFFICE AT T. CHOWDAIAH ROAD, KUMAR PARK WEST, BENGALURU - 560 020, REPRESENTED BY ITS COMMISSIONER

¶15

…RESPONDENT

¶16

(BY SRI K.KRISHNA, ADVOCATE)

¶17

THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 AND

¶18

227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DIRECT

¶19

2 - NC: 2024:KHC:51715 WP No. 33919 of 2024

¶20

THE RESPONDENT TO CONVEY SITE NO. 110A IN KORAMANGALA IV 'B' BLOCK, IN FAVOUR OF THE PETITIONERS IN TERMS OF THE CONFIRMATION LETTER ISSUED BY THE RESPONDENT DATED 09.12.2005 BEARING NO. ¨ÉA.C.¥Áæ/C/¸À/110/A/2005-06 (ANNEXURE-E) BY EXECUTING A SALE DEED AND ISSUING A POSSESSION CERTIFICATE IN FAVOUR OF THE PETITIONERS AND ETC.

¶21

THIS WRIT PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:

¶22

CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH

¶23

ORAL ORDER

¶24

Sri. K.Krishna, learned counsel accepts notice for the respondent.

¶25

The grievance of the petitioners in this writ

¶26

petition is with regard to considering the case of the petitioners for conveying of Site No.110A in Koramangala IV ‘B’ Block in favour of the petitioners in terms of the confirmation letter produced at Annexure ‘E’ and ‘F’ to the writ petition.

¶27

NC: 2024:KHC:51715 WP No. 33919 of 2024

¶28

¶29

Having taken note of the factual accepts on

¶30

record and without expressing any opinion on the merits of

¶31

the case, respondent-BDA is directed to consider the representation dated 8.10.2024 (Annexure ‘L-5’) with an

¶32

outer limit of four months from the date of this order.

¶33

With this observation, writ petition is disposed of.

¶34

SD/(E.S.INDIRESH) JUDGE

¶35

SD List No.: 1 Sl No.: 14

Mr Rangaswamy Babu v. Bengaluru Development Authority

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Mr Rangaswamy Babu v. Bengaluru Development Authority

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Sri T Krishnamurthy Vs the State of Karnataka

Mrs. Nayan Taj Vs the Commissioner

Sri Muddaiah Vs State of Karnataka

Sri Basavarajappa Vs the State of Karnataka

Smt. Jayamma Vs the Mysore Urban Development Authority

Sri Doddanna Vs State of Karnataka