A writ petition filed under Article 226 was declared infructuous as the petitioner's counsel filed a memo praying for dismissal, which was unopposed by respondents.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 27TH DAY OF AUGUST, 2024
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE R. NATARAJ WRIT PETITION NO. 12467 OF 2012 (S-DE)
BETWEEN:
K ANJINAPPA, S/O CHIKKA NARAYANAPPA , AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS, R/AT NO 11, PARADISE APARTMENTS, 5TH CROSS PRASHANTHINAGAR, BANGALORE - 560 079.
…PETITIONER
(BY SRI NIRUPAN GOWDA H. N, ADVOCATE)
AND:
Digitally signed by MARKONAHALLI RAMU PRIYA Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
…RESPONDENTS
(SMT. SUNITH SRINIVAS, ADVOCATE FOR R1 AND R2)
THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE PRAYING TO UASH THE FOLLOWING ORDERS PASSED BY THE RESPONDENTS 1 & 2 BY DECLARING THE SAME AS ILLEGAL,
IRREGULAR, ARBITRARY, CAPRICIOUS, MALAFIDE AND NOT SUSTAINABLE EITHER IN LAW OR ON FACTS. i] ORDER DATED 7/9.2.2008 PASSED BY THE 1ST RESPONDENT VIDE ANNEXURE-P AND ETC.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE R. NATARAJ
ORAL ORDER
The learned counsel for the petitioner has filed a memo stating that the petition has become infructuous and therefore prays that the petition may be dismissed as having become infructuous. The copy of the memo is served to learned counsel for respondent Nos.1 and 2, who does not have any objection.
infructuous.
Sd/(R. NATARAJ) JUDGE
THM
List No.: 1 Sl No.: 50
K ANJINAPPA
KARNATAKA SOAPS AND DETERGENTS LTD.
THE CHAIRMAN, BOARD OF DIRECTORS AND APPELLATE AUTHORITY, KARNATAK SOAPS AND DETERGENTS LTD.
R NATARAJ
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
