The petitioner filed writ petitions challenging orders passed by the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal. During the pendency of the petitions, the parties settled the matter amicably. The petitioner filed memos for withdrawal, and the Court dismissed the petitions as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
NC: 2024:KHC-D:16765 WP No. 112527 of 2017 C/W WP No. 112526 of 2017
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, DHARWAD BENCH
DATED THIS THE 19TH DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2024
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C.M. POONACHA
WRIT PETITION NO.112527 OF 2017 (GM-CPC) C/W WRIT PETITION NO.112526 OF 2017
IN W.P.NO.112527/2017:
BETWEEN:
ARJUN S/O. BHIMAPPA PANADI, AGE: 47 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURE, R/O: HALINGALI, TQ: JAMAKHANDI.
…PETITIONER
(BY SRI PRASHANT S KADADEVAR, ADVOCATE)
AND:
Digitally signed by SAROJA HANGARAKI Location: High Court of Karnataka
NC: 2024:KHC-D:16765 WP No. 112527 of 2017 C/W WP No. 112526 of 2017
AGE: 22 YEARS, OCC: HOUSEWIFE, R/O: CHOUDAYYA NAGAR, JAMKHANDI, TQ: JAMKHANDI, DIST: BAGALKOT.
…RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI G.N.RAICHUR, ADVOCATE FOR R4; SRI A.A.MULWADMATH, ADVOCATE FOR R6; NOTICE TO R1 IS SERVED)
THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO, ISSUE WRIT IN THE NATUER OF CERTIORARI BY QUASHING THE IMPUGNED ORDER ON IA.NO.17 DATED 08.12.2017 PASSED IN MVC NO.207/ 2015 ON THE FILE OF PRL. SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND MOTOR ACCIDENT CLAIMS TRIBUNAL-V, JAMAKHANDI (ANNEXURE-H) AND ETC.,
IN W.P.NO.112526/2017:
BETWEEN:
ARJUN S/O. BHIMAPPA PANADI, AGE: 47 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURE, R/O: HALINGALI, TQ: JAMAKHANDI,
…PETITIONER
(BY SRI PRASHANT S. KADADEVAR,ADVOCATE)
NC: 2024:KHC-D:16765 WP No. 112527 of 2017 C/W WP No. 112526 of 2017
AND:
RESPONDENTS NO.1 TO 3 ARE R/O: CHOUDAYYA NAGAR, JAMKHANDI, TQL: JAMKHANDI, DIST: BAGALKOT.
…RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI M.H.PATIL, ADVOCATE FOR R5; NOTICE TO R1 TO R3 ARE SERVED)
THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO, ISSUE WRIT IN THE NATURE OF CERTIORARI BY QUASHING THE IMPUGNED ORDER ON IA NO.16 DATED 08.12.2017 PASSED IN MVC NO.208/2015 ON THE FILE OF PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND MOTOR ACCIDENT CLAIMS TRIBUNAL - V JAMAKHANDI (ANNEXURE-G) AND ETC.,
NC: 2024:KHC-D:16765 WP No. 112527 of 2017 C/W WP No. 112526 of 2017
THESE PETITIONS, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C.M. POONACHA
ORAL ORDER
(PER: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C.M. POONACHA)
The petitioner has filed memos for withdrawal of the
writ petitions, which read as follows:
“In WP No.112527/2017
Memo For Withdrawal
Here the counsel for the Petitioner humbly submits as under:
The top noted Writ Petition is filed challenging order passed on IA.no.17 vide order dated 08.12.2017 in MVC no.207/2015 (Annexure-H) passed by the Pril. Senior Civil Judge and MACT-V, Jamkhandi.
During the pendency of the above petition, the parties got settled the matter amicably and therefore, the petitioner wishes to withdraw the above petition in order to enable him to report the settlement before the trial court and get it close. Hence this memo for seeking withdrawal of the above writ petition.
In WP No.112526/2017
Memo For Withdrawal
Here the counsel for the Petitioner humbly submits as under:
The top noted Writ Petition is filed challenging order passed on IA.no.16 vide order dated 08.12.2017 in MVC no.208/2015 (Annexure-H) passed by the Pril. Senior Civil Judge and MACT-V, Jamkhandi.
During the pendency of the above petition, the parties got settled the matter amicably and therefore, the petitioner wishes to withdraw the above petition in order to enable him to report the settlement before the trial court and get it close. Hence this memo for seeking withdrawal of the above writ petition.”
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the
matter has been amicably settled and the petitioner is also
present before the Court.
The same is placed on record.
In view of the aforementioned, the above writ
petitions are dismissed as withdrawn.
Sd/(C.M. POONACHA) JUDGE
SH/CT-ASC List No.: 1 Sl No.: 1
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the writ petitions challenging MACT orders should be allowed or dismissed?
1 provisions across 1 enactments
ARJUN S/O. BHIMAPPA PANADI
SMT. KALLAWWA W/O. SATTEPPA JAINAPUR
YALLAVVA W/O. BALAPPA TALAWAR
MAHESH S/O. RAMAPPA BILAVADI
THE DIVISIONAL MANAGER, NATIONAL INSURANCE COMPANY LTD.
MANJUNATH S/O. RAJENDRA RATE
C.M. POONACHA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
