The petitioners sought eviction by the respondents under the SARFAESI Act. Counsel appeared and filed a memo stating the petition was rendered infructuous, seeking withdrawal.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
NC: 2024:KHC:20866 WP No. 1008 of 2023
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 12TH DAY OF JUNE, 2024 BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE S.R.KRISHNA KUMAR WRIT PETITION NO. 1008 OF 2023 (GM-RES)
BETWEEN:
Digitally signed by Vandana S Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
…PETITIONERS
(BY SRI. RAJESH SHETTIGAR, ADVOCATE)
AND:
…RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. B S MAHENDRA, ADVOCATE FOR R1)
THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DIRECT THE R1 TO FOLLOW THE DUE PROCEDURE OF LAW UNDER THE PROVISIONS OF SARFAESI ACT AND EVICT THE PETITIONERS FROM THE SCHEDULE PROPERTY AND ETC.,
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR HEARING, THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
NC: 2024:KHC:20866 WP No. 1008 of 2023
ORDER
Learned counsel for the petitioners have filed a memo dated
12.06.2024 stating that the petition has rendered infructuous and hence,
he seeks leave of this Court to withdraw the petition.
as withdrawn.
Sd/JUDGE
BMC List No.: 1 Sl No.: 59
2 provisions across 2 enactments
MR SELVAKUMAR
MR. PRAVEEN KUMAR
A. IRUDHYA RAJ
SMT. INDRANI
SRI. K. MANOGARAN
MAHILA CO OPERATIVE BANK LTD
S.R.KRISHNA KUMAR
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
