Regular second appeal under Section 100 CPC challenging a decree in a property suit. No one appeared for the appellant despite being called thrice; the appeal was dismissed for non-prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
NC: 2024:KHC:17955 RSA No. 67 of 2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 28TH DAY OF MAY, 2024
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE SURAJ GOVINDARAJ REGULAR SECOND APPEAL NO. 67 OF 2013 (SP)
BETWEEN:
SMT. PRABHAMANI W/O M.S. PRASAD AGED ABOUT 44 YEARS SANTHEMARAHALLI CHAMARAJANAGAR TALUK & DISTRICT
…APPELLANT
(BY SRI.K.S.RAHUL CARIYAPPA., ADVOCATE-ABSENT)
AND:
SRI. G. MAHADEVAPPA S/O R. GURUSIDDAPPA SANTHEMARAHALLI VILLAGE CHAMARAJANAGAR TALUK & DISTRICT
Digitally signed by SHWETHA RAGHAVENDRA Location: High Court of Karnataka
…RESPONDENT (BY SRI.AKARSH KUMAR GOWDA., ADVOCATE FOR R1) THIS RSA IS FILED UNDER SECTION 100 OF CPC., PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE JUDGEMENT & DECREE DTD 10.10.2012 PASSED IN R.A.NO.43/2011 ON THE FILE OF PRESIDING OFFICER, FAST TRACK COURT, KOLLEGAL, SITTING AT CHAMARAJANAGAR, THEREBY RESTORING THE JUDGEMENT AND DECREE DTD 24.8.2011 PASSED IN OS.NO.109/2007 ON THE FILE OF SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND CJM, CHAMARAJANAGAR.
THIS RSA, COMING ON FOR FINAL HEARING, THIS DAY, THE COURT DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
JUDGMENT
None appears for the appellant though called thrice. It appears that the appellant is not interested in prosecuting the matter. Hence, the appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution.
Sd/JUDGE
SR List No.: 1 Sl No.: 42
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Smt. Prabhamani
Sri. G. Mahadevappa
Suraj Govindaraj
As recorded by the court registry
2 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
