Regular second appeal under Section 100 CPC against a decree in a land/title matter. No one appeared for the appellant despite being called thrice; the appeal was dismissed for non-prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
NC: 2024:KHC:17957 RSA No. 229 of 2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 28TH DAY OF MAY, 2024
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE SURAJ GOVINDARAJ REGULAR SECOND APPEAL NO. 229 OF 2013 (INJ)
BETWEEN:
SRI. ARASIKERE MOHAMMED ALI S/O HUSSEIN SAB ATTAR AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS KIRANI MERCHANT R/O ARASIKERE HARAPANAHALLI TALUK-583131
…APPELLANT
(BY SRI.D.R. SUNDRESH., ADVOCATE-ABSENT)
AND:
Digitally signed by SHWETHA RAGHAVENDRA Location: High Court of Karnataka
…RESPONDENTS (BY SRI.N.SHANKARANARAYANA BHAT., ADVOCATE FOR C/R1) THIS RSA IS FILED UNDER SECTION 100 OF CPC., PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE JUDGEMENT & DECREE PASSED IN R.A.NO.7/2012 DATED 3.11.2012 ON THE FILE OF IIND ADDITIONAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE DAVANAGERE AND CONFIRMED THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE PASSED BY CIVIL JUDGE, HARAPANAHALLI IN O.S.NO.83/2004 DATED 16.12.2011 BY ALLOWING THIS APPEAL WITH COST THROUGH OUT.
THIS RSA, COMING ON FOR FINAL HEARING, THIS DAY, THE COURT DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
JUDGMENT
None appears for the appellant though called thrice. It appears that the appellant is not interested in prosecuting the matter. Hence, the appeal is dismissed
for non-prosecution.
Sd/JUDGE
SR List No.: 1 Sl No.: 52
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Sri. Arasikere Mohammed Ali
S. Prakash
Chief Officer, T.M.C., Harapanahalli
Suraj Govindaraj
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
