Regular second appeal dismissed for non-prosecution as no counsel appeared for the appellants despite being called thrice.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 28TH DAY OF MAY, 2024
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE SURAJ GOVINDARAJ
REGULAR SECOND APPEAL NO. 1045 OF 2013 (DEC/INJ)
BETWEEN:
BOTH ARE RESIDENTS OF KODIHALLI VILLAGE, KORA HOBLI-572128 TUMKUR TALUK AND DISTRICT
Digitally signed by SHWETHA RAGHAVENDRA Location: High Court of Karnataka
…APPELLANTS (BY SRI.V.B. SIDDARAMAIAH., ADVOCATE FOR PROPOSED A(A) & A(B)-ABSENT)
AND:
SRI.K.B.SIDDAPPA S/O BHEEMANNA AGED ABOUT 69 YEARS R/A KODIHALLI VILLAGE KORA HOBLI-572128 TUMKUR TALUK AND DISTRICT
…RESPONDENT
THIS RSA IS FILED UNDER ORDER XLII RULE-1 R/W SECTION 100 OF CPC., PRAYING TO SET-ASIDE THE JUDGEMENT & DECREE DATED 26.4.2013 PASSED IN R.A.NO.193/2008 (OLD NO.204/2005) ON THE FILE OF THE PRESIDING OFFICER, FAST TRACK COURT-I,
TUMKUR, WHICH WAS FILED AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 6.10.2005 PASSED IN OS.NO.61/1994 ON THE FILE OF THE II ADDL. CIVIL JUDGE(JR.DN) & JMFC., TUMKUR.
THIS RSA, COMING ON FOR HEARING ON INTERLOCUTORY APPLICATION, THIS DAY, THE COURT DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
JUDGMENT
None appears for the appellants though called thrice. It appears that the appellants are not interested in prosecuting the matter. Hence, the appeal is dismissed
for non-prosecution.
Sd/JUDGE
SR List No.: 1 Sl No.: 6
Smt. Shivamma (dead by LRs, represented by proposed LRs Sri. Siddagangaiah and Sri. Mruthyunjaya K.C.)
Sri. K.B. Siddappa
Suraj Govindaraj
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
