Regular second appeal against concurrent decrees in a suit; counsel reported the appellant died during the Covid-19 pandemic and his legal representatives could not be ascertained. The High Court dismissed the appeal as abated.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
NC: 2024:KHC:21989 RSA No. 274 of 2011
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 19TH DAY OF JUNE, 2024
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE V SRISHANANDA REGULAR SECOND APPEAL NO. 274 OF 2011 (DEC)
BETWEEN:
NANJUNDAPPA S/O LATE MAHESHAPPA AGED ABOUT 57 YEARS R/AT MARALKUNTE VILLAGE JALA HOBLI,
BANGALORE NORTH TALUK 562 149.
…APPELLANT
(BY SRI. VIJAY KUMAR Y. ADVOCATE FOR
SRI.G.R. LAKSHMIPATHI REDDY., ADVOCATE)
AND:
AGED ABOUT 44 YEARS
Digitally signed by MALATESH K C
Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
THE DEFENDANT NO.3 IS THE MINOR REPRESENTED BY HIS GUARDIAN FATHER THE 1ST RESPONDENT.
NC: 2024:KHC:21989 RSA No. 274 of 2011
ALL ARE R/AT GANGAVARA CHOWDAPANAHALLI VILLAGE CHENNARAYAPATNA HOBLI DEVANAHALLI TALUK 562 129.
…RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. N. SONNEGOWDA ADVOCATE FOR R1 TO R3; R4(A), R4(B), R4(C) AND R4(D) SERVED)
THIS RSA FILED UNDER SEC.100 OF CPC., AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 08.10.2010 PASSED IN R.A.NO.156/2009 ON THE FILE OF THE PRESIDING OFFICER, FAST TRACK COURT-I, BANGALORE RURAL DISTRICT, BANGALORE, DISMISSING THE APPEAL AND CONFIRMING THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 10.07.2009 PASSED IN O.S.NO.655/2006 ON THE FILE OF THE CIVIL JUDGE (SR.DN.) & J.M.F.C.,DEVANAHALLI.
THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR FURTHER ORDERS, THIS DAY, THE COURT DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
ORDER
Counsel for appellant submits that appellant said to have died during Covid-19 pandemic. He also submits that despite best efforts, he could not get the details of the legal representatives of the appellant.
Placing the submission of learned counsel on record, appeal is dismissed as abated.
Sd/JUDGE
MR
List No.: 2 Sl No.: 20
1 provisions across 1 enactments
NANJUNDAPPA S/O LATE MAHESHAPPA
RAMAKRISHNAPPA S/O MUNINANJAPPA
MURALIDHAR S/O RAMAKRISHNAPPA
SRIDHAR S/O RAMAKRISHNAPPA
SUBBARAYAPPA S/O KENCHAPPA
V SRISHANANDA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
