Criminal revision against conviction under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act was not pressed after the parties amicably settled the dispute; the petition was dismissed as withdrawn.
Petition dismissed as withdrawn on the basis of settlement memo filed by the petitioner's counsel.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 18TH DAY OF JUNE, 2024
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE V SRISHANANDA CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION NO. 722 OF 2021
BETWEEN:
MR. VINOD KUMAR S/O LATE MR. KRISHNA REDDY AGED ABOUT 51 YEARS, NO.8, 1ST CROSS, B. Y. NARAYANA REDDY LAYOUT, HORAMAVU MAIN ROAD, BANGALORE - 560 043. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. MALLESH. L.,ADVOCATE) AND:
MRS. N. A. NIRMALA W/O MR. N. A. BHOJARAJ, AGED ABOUT 41 YEARS, NO.64, RAILWAY PARALLEL ROAD, KUMARA PARK WEST, BANGALORE - 560 020.
Digitally signed by V REPRESENTED BY HER GPA HOLDER KRISHNA MR. GOPAL KRISHNA H. V. Location: High S/O MR. VENKATANARASAIAH, Court of Karnataka AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS, NO.26, 1ST MAIN ROAD, ASHRIVAD COLONY, HORAMAVU MAIN ROAD, BANGALORE - 560 043
…RESPONDENT
THIS CRL.RP IS FILED U/S.397 R/W 401 CR.P.C PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE JUDGMENT AND ORDER PASSED BY THE LXIX ADDITIONAL CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS JUDG, BANGLAORE (CCH-70) ON 21.08.2020, DISMISSING THE CRL.A.NO.768/2017 FILED BY THE PETITIONER AND ORDER OF
CONVICTION PASSED BY THE XV ACMM, BANGALORE IN C.C.NO.4513/2017, ON 26.04.2017 AND (COMMON ORDER IN C.C.NO.4513/2017 C.C.NO.4512/2017, C.C.NO.4510/2017) CONVICTING THE PETITIONER FOR THE OFFENCE P/U/S 138 OF N.I ACT BY ALLOWING THIS CRL.RP AND CONSEQUENTLY DISMISS THE COMPLAINT FILED BY THE RESPONDENT, AGAINST THE PETITIONER IN C.C.NO.4513/2017 ON THE FILE OF THE XV ACMM, BANGALORE.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ADMISSION, THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
ORDER
Memo is filed by learned counsel for the petitioner, which reads as under:
"I, the undersigned, the advocate for the petitioner submits that the matter involved in the above petition is amicably settled between the parties and consequently the above petition has become infructuous and hence this Hon'ble Court may be pleased to dismiss the above petition, as not pressed, in the interests of justice."
dismissed as withdrawn.
Sd/JUDGE
LDC List No.: 1 Sl No.: 40
3 provisions across 2 enactments
Mr. Vinod Kumar
Mrs. N. A. Nirmala represented by her GPA holder Mr. Gopal Krishna H. V.
V Srishananda
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
