The High Court dismissed a revision petition filed by a husband challenging the Family Court's maintenance order. The Court held that the granted amount of Rs.5,000 per month was correct given the petitioner's employment salary, dismissing the challenge.
Revision petition dismissed; Family Court's order of maintenance of Rs.5,000/month upheld.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
NC: 2024:KHC:2173 RPFC No. 37 of 2020
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 17TH DAY OF JANUARY, 2024
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE HANCHATE SANJEEVKUMAR
REV.PET FAMILY COURT NO. 37 OF 2020
BETWEEN:
S/O NINGAIAH AGED ABOUT 49 YEARS R/AT NO.46/3, 2ND CROSS, KAMAKSHI HOSPITAL ROAD, SARASWATHIPURAM, MYSURU-570009.
…PETITIONER
(BY SMT. BHARATHI.M., FOR SRI. VENKATESH R BHAGAT., ADVOCATE)
AND:
Digitally signed by RAMYA D
Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
W/O NINGEGOWDA S C/O SHIVANNA AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS R/AT NO.2517, 5TH CROSS, K G KOPPALU, MYSURU-570 009.
…RESPONDENT
(RESPONDENT SERVED AND UNREPRESENTED)
THIS RPFC IS FILED UNDER SECTION 19(4) OF THE FAMILY COURTS ACT, 1984, AGAINST THE ORDER DATED 17.07.2019 PASSED IN C.MIS.NO.666 OF 2018 ON THE FILE OF THE IV ADDITIONAL PRINCIPAL FAMILY JUDGE, MYSURU, PARTLY ALLOWING THE PETITION FILED UNDER SECTION 125 OF Cr.P.C. FOR MAINTENANCE.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS , THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
ORDER
Technical Assistant, he must be receiving salary at least according to the Minimum Wages Act.
7. Therefore, whatever maintenance is granted by the
Family Court is correct, which needs no interference. Hence, the present petition is dismissed .
Sd/JUDGE
RK CT: SN List No.: 1 Sl No.: 29
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the Family Court order granting Rs.5,000 monthly maintenance to the wife was erroneous and demanded to be set aside by this High Court.
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Ningegowda
Pushpalatha S
Hanchate Sanjeevkumar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
