The revision petition challenging a maintenance decree was disposed of after the parties submitted a joint affidavit setting the dispute amicably via a settlement of Rs. 27 lakhs.
Petition dismissed; main petition disposed of; stay application disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
NC: 2024:KHC:2252 RPFC No. 78 of 2023
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 16TH DAY OF JANUARY, 2024 BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE HANCHATE SANJEEVKUMAR
REV.PET FAMILY COURT NO.78 OF 2023 (FC)
BETWEEN:
SRI. CHETAN KUMAR AGED ABOUT 41 YEARS S/O DR. M. JAVARAIAH NO.1171, 5TH MAIN ROAD, H.B.R. LAYOUT, BENGALURU - 560 043.
…PETITIONER (BY SRI. PRAKASH. A FOR SRI. ARAVIND .M. NEGLUR, ADVOCATE)
AND:
Digitally signed by RAMYA D Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
SMT. YASHASWINI AGED ABOUT 36 YEARS D/O. SRI. JAGADISH R/AT NO.1327, AVVA', OPP. DIVYAROOPA KALYANA MANTAPA,V1ST STAGE VIJAYANAGARA, MYSURU – 570 017.
…RESPONDENT (BY SRI. JAYANTH V, ADVOCATE)
THIS RPFC IS FILED UNDER SECTION 19(4) OF FAMILY COURT ACTS AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 30.11.2022 PASSED IN MC NO.701/2021 ON THE FILE OF THE I ADDITIONAL PRINCIPAL JUDGE, FAMILY COURT, MYSURU ALLOWING THE PETITION FILED UNDER SECTION 13(1A) (ii) OF THE HINDU MARRIAGE ACT.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ADMISSION, THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
ORDER
This revision petition is filed by the husband challenging the judgment passed by the I Additional Principal Judge, Family Court, Mysuru, in M.C.No.701/2021.
respondent/wife are present before the Court. Sri.Arvind M. Neglur, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner/husband and Sri.Jayanth V, learned counsel appearing for the respondent/wife, are present.
final settlement of all dues and liabilities and the said amount is given by way of demand draft as described in the affidavit.
hereby placed on record. Further both counsels have submitted that they do not have any further grievance, claims against each other and by this affidavit they have settled the matter amicably in all respects. Also it is further agreed that husband has filed Crl.P.No.2953/2021 to quash the proceedings in C.C.No.51519/2019 pending on the file of XI Addl. CMM, Bengaluru and the respondent/wife consented to quash the said proceedings and she will not press C.C.No.51519/2019 pending on the file of XI Addl. CMM, Bengaluru.
part and parcel of the order. It is submitted that there is a typographical error crept in mentioning the name of respondent/wife in the Demand Draft No.217832 drawn on State Bank of India, Rajajinagar 3rd Block Branch, Bengaluru, dated 11.01.2024 for Rs.12,00,000/-. The petitioner/husband has undertaken to get rectified the said demand draft in the correct name of the respondent/wife and handover to the respondent/wife by end of the day.
Sd/JUDGE
DR List No.: 1 Sl No.: 46
Chetan Kumar
Yashaswini
Hanchate Sanjeevkumar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
