This judgment records a procedural order admitting and dismissing an infructuous revision petition filed under Section 46(1) of the Karnataka Rent Act, as the main petition was disposed of by the trial court.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 17TH DAY OF JANUARY, 2024
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE HANCHATE SANJEEVKUMAR HOUSE RENT REV. PETITION NO. 8 OF 2022 (IO)
BETWEEN:
…PETITIONER
(BY SRI.S.A. AHMED KHAN., ADVOCATE)
AND:
Digitally signed by RAMYA D Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
…RESPONDENT
(BY SRI.ARJUN REGO FOR M/S.REGO AND REGO ADVOCATES)
THIS HRRP IS FILED UNDER SECTION 46(1) OF THE KARNATAKA RENT ACT, AGAINST THE ORDER DATED 21.02.2022 PASSED ON I.A. IN HRC NO.10021/2018 ON THE FILE OF THE XV ADDITIONAL SMALL CAUSES JUDGE AND XXIII ACMM, BENGALURU, DISMISSING THE I.A. FILED UNDER SECTION 43 OF THE KARNATAKA RENT ACT AND RULE 33 OF KARNATAKA RENT RULES R/W SECTION 151 OF CPC.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ADMISSION , THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
ORDER
respondent that the present Revision Petition is filed against an interim order granted by the Trial Court.
Thus, the present petition has become infructuous . A Memo has also been filed to this effect.
counsel are placed on record.
as having become infructuous .
Sd/JUDGE
RK CT: SN List No.: 1 Sl No.: 36
Mr. Bakathulla Khan
Mr. Kanaga Sabai
Hanchate Sanjeevkumar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
