Revision petition against an interim maintenance order under Section 125(2) CrPC was withdrawn on a memo stating a writ petition was the proper remedy; petition dismissed as withdrawn with liberty.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 9TH DAY OF JULY, 2024
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE RAVI V HOSMANI
REV.PET FAMILY COURT NO. 130 OF 2024
BETWEEN:
SRI. FANI KIRAN @ KIRAN SHASTHRI, S/O LATE SHIVASHANKAR SHASTHRI, AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS, R/AT FRONT TO RAMAKRISHNA SHRIPADA NILAYA, VIDYARANYAPURA VILLAGE, SRINGERI TALUK, CHIKKAMANGALORE DISTRICT.
…PETITIONER
(BY SRI K.S.NARAYANA SWAMY, ADVOCATE)
AND:
Digitally signed by GEETHAKUMARI PARLATTAYA S
Location: High Court of Karnataka
…RESPONDENTS
THIS RPFC IS FILED UNDER SEC.19(4) OF THE FAMILY COURT ACT., AGAINST THE ORDER DATED 16.05.2024.
PASSED ON IA NO.1 IN CRL. MISC. NO.25/2022 ON THE FILE OF CIVIL JUDG AND JMFC, SRINGERI, PARTLY ALLOWING THE PETITION FILED UNDER SEC.125(2) OF CR.P.C., FOR INTERIM MAINTENANCE.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
ORDER
Learned counsel for petitioner has filed a memo stating
that against impugned order, writ petition requires to be filed. In view of same, present petition is not maintainable and seeks
for dismissal of petition as withdrawn.
Memo is taken on record.
With liberty as sought for, petition is dismissed as
withdrawn.
Sd/JUDGE
MKM
List No.: 1 Sl No.: 16
SRI. FANI KIRAN @ KIRAN SHASTHRI
SMT. SUPRABHA B.C.
MR. ARJUN SHASTHRI
RAVI V HOSMANI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
