Miscellaneous Second Appeal filed under Section 54(2) of the Land Acquisition Act dismissed for non-prosecution as the appellant failed to comply with office objections after six listings.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 8TH DAY OF JULY, 2024
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE RAVI V HOSMANI MISCELLANEOUS SECOND APPEAL NO. 13 OF 2023 (LA)
BETWEEN:
SMT. PUTTARAJAMMA, W/O MADEGOWDA, AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS, R/AT SIDDARAMAIAHNAHUNDI VILLAGE, VARUNA HOBLI, MYSORE TALUK AND DISTRICT - 570 010.
…APPELLANT
(BY SRI. MANJUNATH N.D., ADVOCATE - ABSENT.)
AND:
Digitally signed by GEETHAKUMARI PARLATTAYA S Location: High Court of Karnataka
…RESPONDENT
THIS MSA IS FILED UNDER SECTION 54(2) OF THE LAND ACQUISITION ACT PRAYING TO CALL FOR THE RECORDS IN L.A.C. APPEAL NO.36/2014 ON THE FILE OF LEARNED V ADDITIONAL DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE, MYSORE COURT AND ETC.
THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, THE COURT DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
JUDGMENT
None appears.
Though matter was listed for non-compliance of
office objections for 6th time, they are not yet complied. This would indicate that appellant is not interested in pursuing appeal.
Accordingly, appeal is dismissed for
non-prosecution.
Sd/JUDGE
RMS List No.: 1 Sl No.: 15
Smt. Puttarajamma, W/o Madegowda
The Special Land Acquisition Officer, K. R. Project, Mysore
Ravi V Hosmani
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
