Tirumalegowda v. Special Land Acquisiton Officer
Case brief
What is this about?
2024:KHC:26828 MFA No. 5084 of 2023 IN THE…
2024:KHC:26828 MFA No. 5084 of 2023 IN THE…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
NC: 2024:KHC:26828 MFA No. 5084 of 2023
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 8TH DAY OF JULY, 2024
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE RAVI V HOSMANI MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL NO. 5084 OF 2023 (LAC)
BETWEEN:
TIRUMALEGOWDA, S/O MOODLOGIRIGOWDA, AGED ABOUT 71 YEARS, R/O YATTINAKATTE VILLAGE, KASABA HOBLI, HASSAN TALUK DISTRICT – 573 201.
…APPELLANT
(BY SMT.ANUPAMA D.A., ADVOCATE FOR SRI. GIRISH B BALADARE., ADVOCATE)
AND:
Digitally signed by GEETHAKUMARI PARLATTAYA S Location: High Court of Karnataka
SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER, HEMAVATHI RESERVOIR PROJECT (HRP) – II, HASSAN - 573 201.
…RESPONDENT
THIS MFA IS FILED U/S.54(1) OF LAND ACQUISITION ACT, AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND AWARD DATED 08.12.2014 PASSED IN LAC NO.110/2012 ON THE FILE OF THE II ADDITIONAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, HASSAN, PARTLY ALLOWING THE REFERENCE PETITION U/S.18(1) OF LAND ACQUISITION ACT.
THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, THE COURT DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
JUDGMENT
On 24.06.2024 when matter was listed for noncompliance of office objections for 5th time, at request of learned counsel, further two weeks' time was granted on payment of cost of Rs.1,000/-. Till today, neither cost is paid nor office objections are complied. This would indicate that appellant is not diligent in prosecuting appeal.
Hence, appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution.
Sd/JUDGE
MKM
List No.: 1 Sl No.: 4
TIRUMALEGOWDA, S/O MOODLOGIRIGOWDA
SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER, HEMAVATHI RESERVOIR PROJECT (HRP) – II
RAVI V HOSMANI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court