Appeal against a decree for partition and separate possession was dismissed for non-prosecution as office objections were not cured despite four years of time granted.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
NC: 2024:KHC:36076 RFA No. 1032 of 2020
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 4TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2024
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE V SRISHANANDA REGULAR FIRST APPEAL NO. 1032 OF 2020 (PAR)
BETWEEN:
MR. NANDAKUMAR KRISHNAPPA S/O LATE K. B. KRISHNAPPA, AGED ABOUT 53 YEARS, R/AT NO.39, PALACE ROAD, BANGALORE - 560 052.
…APPELLANT
(BY SRI. LOMESH KIRAN N., ADVOCATE)
AND:
Digitally signed by MALATESH K C Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
…RESPONDENTS
THIS RFA IS FILED UNDER SEC.96 OF CPC., AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 22.10.2019 PASSED IN OS.NO.9553/2007 ON THE FILE OF THE XVIII ADDITIONAL CITY CIVIL JUDGE, BENGALURU CITY, PARTLY DECREEING THE SUIT FOR PARTITION AND SEPARATE POSSESSION.
THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER:
NC: 2024:KHC:36076 RFA No. 1032 of 2020
CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE V SRISHANANDA
ORAL JUDGMENT
Learned counsel for appellant prays time. However, sufficient time is already been granted to cure the office objections.
Since, office objections are not complied for last four
years, appeal stands dismissed for non-prosecution.
Sd/(V SRISHANANDA) JUDGE
AKV List No.: 1 Sl No.: 17 CT:SK
MR. NANDAKUMAR KRISHNAPPA
MISS JYOTHSNA KRISHNAPPA
SMT. LALANA KRISHNAPPA
SMT. JANAKI KRISHNAPPA
V SRISHANANDA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
