This judgment dismissed an appeal filed under Section 96 of CPC against a money decree by default, as the appellant did not appear before the Court.
Appeal dismissed for non-prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 3RD DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2024
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE V SRISHANANDA REGULAR FIRST APPEAL NO. 1037 OF 2015 (MON)
BETWEEN:
REP BY ITS PROPRIETOR, MR.M.KOTRESH, NO.22, OPP. BANGALORE INTERNATIONAL SCHOOL, UTTARAHALLIMAIN ROAD, KSRTC LAYOUT, BANGALORE-61.
…APPELLANT
(BY SRI ANANDA V, ADVOCATE - (ABSENT))
AND:
Digitally signed by MALATESH K C Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
…RESPONDENT
(RESPONDENT SERVED AND UNREPRESENTED)
THIS RFA IS FILED UNDER SECTION 96 OF CPC, AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 13.04.2015 PASSED IN OS NO.8573/2013 ON THE FILE OF THE XIV ADDL. CITY CIVIL JUDGE, BENGALURU, (CCH 28) PARTLY DECREEING THE SUIT FOR RECOVERY OF MONEY.
THIS APPEAL COMING ON FOR HEARING, THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE V SRISHANANDA
ORAL JUDGMENT
None appears for the appellant. Appeal is by the defendant challenging the money decree. Suit is of the year 2013, decreed on 13th April, 2015.
decreed.
dismissed for non-prosecution.
Sd/-
(V SRISHANANDA) JUDGE
CHS List No.: 1 Sl No.: 68
SRI BANASHANKARI TRADERS REP BY ITS PROPRIETOR, MR.M.KOTRESH
M/S KUNDAN ELECTRONICS REPRESENTED BY ITS PROPRIETOR, MR. NARENDRA KUMAR
V SRISHANANDA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
