M/S Sri Shakhti Lpg Limited v. M/S Lakshmi Agencies
Case brief
What is this about?
Appeal against a money recovery decree dismissed for non-prosecution as no one appeared for the appellants and paper books were not filed despite time granted.
Appeal against a money recovery decree dismissed for non-prosecution as no one appeared for the appellants and paper books were not filed despite time granted.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
NC: 2024:KHC:36242 RFA No. 85 of 2016
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 3RD DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2024
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE V SRISHANANDA REGULAR FIRST APPEAL NO.85 OF 2016 (MON)
BETWEEN:
Digitally signed by MALATESH K C Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
...APPELLANTS (BY SMT KARISHMA NAGHNOOR NADAF, ADVOCATE -ABSENT)
NC: 2024:KHC:36242 RFA No. 85 of 2016
AND:
...RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI B C AVINASH, ADVOCATE FOR R1 AND R2)
THIS RFA IS FILED ORDER XLI RULE 1 R/W SECTION 96 OF CPC, 1908 AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 01.10.2015 PASSED IN O.S.No.4894/2002 ON THE FILE OF THE III ADDL. CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS JUDGE, BENGALURU CITY, (CCH.NO.25), DECREEING THE SUIT FOR RECOVERY OF MONEY.
THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE V SRISHANANDA
NC: 2024:KHC:36242 RFA No. 85 of 2016
ORAL ORDER
Case called twice. None appears for the appellants.
Despite granting sufficient time, paper books are not filed.
Accordingly, appeal stands dismissed for non prosecution.
Sd/(V SRISHANANDA)
JUDGE
MR List No.: 1 Sl No.: 10
M/S Sri Shakhti LPG Limited
The Manager (Legal) M/S Shakhti LPG Limited
M/S Sri Shakthi LPG Ltd
M/S Shri Matre Power and Infrastructure Ltd.
M/S Lakshmi Agencies
Mrs G Subbalakshmi
V SRISHANANDA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court