The appellant sought withdrawal of the appeal against an arbitral award after the competent authority approved its implementation. The court permitted the withdrawal and dismissed the appeal as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 24TH DAY OF OCTOBER, 2024
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE H.P.SANDESH
MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL NO.862 OF 2024 (AA)
BETWEEN:
…APPELLANT
(BY SRI. PRAKASHA V. ANGADI, ADVOCATE)
AND:
Digitally signed by DEVIKA M Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
ALL ARE R/AT MUSTHAFA HOUSE, MONAPPA COMPOUND, MARNAMIKATTE HOUSE, JEPPU, MANGALURU, D.K-575002.
NC: 2024:KHC:42794 MFA No. 862 of 2024
…RESPONDENTS
THIS MFA IS FILED UNDER SECTION 37(1)(c) OF THE ARBITRATION AND CONCILIATION ACT, 1996, AGAINST THE JUDGMENT DATED 20.12.2023 PASSED IN A.P.NO.137/2022 ON THE FILE OF THE I ADDITIONAL DISTRICT JUDGE DAKSHINA KANNADA, MANGALURU, DISMISSING THE ARBITRATION PETITION FILED UNDER SECTION 34 OF THE ARBITRATION AND CONCILIATION ACT R/W ORDER VII RULE 1 OF CPC.
THIS APPEAL COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE H.P.SANDESH
ORAL JUDGMENT
The learned counsel for the appellant has filed a memo seeking permission of this Court to withdraw the appeal in view of the approval of the competent authority for implementation of the arbitral award.
Sd/(H.P.SANDESH) JUDGE
MD List No.: 1 Sl No.: 12
2 provisions across 2 enactments
NATIONAL HIGHWAYS AUTHORITY OF INDIA
SHASMEEM
AFFAQUE ABDUL RAHIMAN
AFREEN MARIYAM
AFROZ MOHAMMED
THE ARBITRATOR AND DEPUTY COMMISSIONER, D.K. DISTRICT
H.P.SANDESH
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
