Arbitration appeal under Section 37(1)(a) against rejection of a Section 8(1) application in a civil suit. Counsel submitted the suit itself stood disposed of; the High Court dismissed the appeal as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
NC: 2024:KHC:42795 MFA No. 4067 of 2021
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 24TH DAY OF OCTOBER, 2024
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE H.P.SANDESH
MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL NO.4067 OF 2021 (AA)
BETWEEN:
Digitally signed by DEVIKA M Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
…APPELLANTS
(BY SRI. AJIT P.B., ADVOCATE) S
AND:
…RESPONDENTS
THIS MFA IS FILED UNDER SECTION 37(1)(a) OF THE ARBITRATION AND CONCILIATION ACT, AGAINST THE ORDER DATED 22.07.2019 PASSED ON I.A.NO5 IN O.S.NO.7064/2016 ON THE FILE OF THE III ADDITIONAL CITY CIVIL AND
SESSIONS JUDGE, BENGALURU CITY (CCH-25), REJECTING THE APPLICATION FILED UNDER SECTION 8(1) OF ARBITRATION AND CONCILIATION ACT, 1996.
THIS APPEAL COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE H.P.SANDESH
ORAL JUDGMENT
The learned counsel for the appellants submits that the appeal has become infructuous since the very suit itself is disposed of.
infructuous.
Sd/(H.P.SANDESH) JUDGE
MD
List No.: 1 Sl No.: 4
2 provisions across 2 enactments
M/S. Rajarajeshwari Buildcon Private Limited
Ramanlal M. Sha
B.N. Vishwanath
Mitesh Kumar J. Sha
The Sub-Registrar, Govt. of Karnataka, Jayanagar
The Commissioner, Bruhat Bangalore Mahanagara Palike
H.P. Sandesh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
