under the provisions of the Act. Moreover, the evidence of PW-2, appellant's own witness, belies his case that respondent is incapable of bearing the child. So far as cruelty, the evidence on record shows that the appellant himself did not set up the matrimonial home, where he was working, therefore, the respondent was staying with his parents in his native village. The evidence on record shows that whenever PW-1 was visiting his parental house, the appellant and respondent used to have sexual cohabitation. The evidence of PWs-3 & 4 was not credible to accept the allegations of cruelty. The mother of the appellant was not examined to prove the alleged harassment by the respondent to the parents of the appellant. The trial Court, on judicious appreciation of the evidence, has dismissed the petition and the same does not warrant interference of this Court. He submits that irretrievable break down is not the ground for granting decree of divorce. Therefore, the judgments relied on by the learned counsel for the appellant are not applicable.
