Prakash v. Arathi
Case brief
What is this about?
Appeal against a divorce decree became infructuous after the appellant reported that the respondent had remarried and has a child from the second marriage; the appeal was dismissed recording the memo.
What the court decided
- 1 -
NC: 2024:KHC:20890-DB MFA No. 1596/2020
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 13TH DAY OF JUNE, 2024 PRESENT
THE HON'BLE MRS JUSTICE K.S.MUDAGAL
AND
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE VIJAYKUMAR A. PATIL MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL NO.1596/2020 (MC)
BETWEEN:
PRAKASH S/O ANNAPPA SHETTY AGED ABOUT 41 YEARS R/AT “SRI PRIYA GUDIGARABETTU” HOUSE KOITHAR, PERDOOR POST AND VILLAGE UDUPI TALUK AND DISTRICT – 576 105 …APPELLANT
(BY SRI.M.NAGESH, ADVOCATE FOR SRI.CHANDRASHEKAR, ADVOCATE)
AND:
Digitally signed by PRABHU KUMARA NAIKA Location: High Court of Karnataka
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Prakash S/o Annappa Shetty
- respondent
Arathi
Coram
K.S. Mudagal
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Karnataka HC
- Decided on
- · June
- Registered
- Case no.
- MFA/1596/2020
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court