A 2018 Section 482 CrPC criminal petition seeking cognizance in a private complaint remained stalled for office objections; counsel had retired and no new vakalath was filed. The High Court dismissed the petition for non-compliance of office objection as the petitioner appeared uninterested in prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 3RD DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2024
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MRS JUSTICE M G UMA CRIMINAL PETITION No. 7691 OF 2018
BETWEEN:
SMT. M RATHNAMMA D/O MUNISWAMAPPA AGED ABOUT 64 YEARS R/AT No.8, 4TH CROSS 7TH BLOCK, JAYANAGAR BENGALURU - 560 011.
…PETITIONER
(BY SMT. M RATHNAMMA, ADVOCATE - ABSENT)
AND:
Digitally signed by LAKSHMINARAYANA MURTHY RAJASHRI Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
S/O RAMACHANDRA SUNAGAR AND SMT. JAYASHREE D/O H B BADIGERE AGED ABOUT 37 YEARS R/AT GANESH GUMER BUILDING TAGORE BUILDING ROAD GADAG.
DEFENDANT Nos.6 TO 9 ARE RESIDING AT BADAG BETAGARI, GADAG DHARWAD DISTRICT.
REPERSENTED BY ITS MANAGING PARTNER SRI M.V.RAMAIAH
…RESPONDENTS
THIS CRL.P IS FILED U/S.482 CR.P.C PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE ORDER DATED 11.11.2016 PASSED BY THE IV A.C.M.M., BANGALORE IN PCR.No.11319/2016 AND ORDER DATED 07.09.2018 IN CRL.RP.No.854/2016 PASSED BY THE LXLVII ADDITIONAL CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS JUDGE, BANGALORE (CCH-68) AND TO DIRECT THE LEARNED MAGISTRATE TO TAKE COGNIZANCE IN PCR.No.11319/2016 AND ETC.,
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MRS JUSTICE M G UMA
ORAL ORDER
Learned counsel for the petitioner is absent. No
representation. The order sheet dated 25.05.2022 reads as under;
“Learned counsel for the petitioner has filed a memo seeking leave of this Court to retire from the case stating that the party has taken back the papers. Acknowledgment is also produced to that effect.
The memo is taken on record.
Office is directed to delete the name of Sri.Srihari A.V., as Counsel appearing for the
petitioner and to reflect the name of the petitioner in the cause list.”
Thereafter, no one has filed vakalath representing the petitioner. The matter is of the year 2018. It is listed for the fifth time for compliance of office objection. Still there is no progress in the matter. It appears that the petitioner is not interested in prosecuting the petition. Hence, the petition is dismissed for non compliance of
office objection .
Sd/(M G UMA) JUDGE
GH
List No.: 1 Sl No.: 30
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Smt. M Rathnamma
Smt. Savithri Bai
Sri Suresh
Smt. Aruna Ranga
Smt. Arati
Ajith Kumar T H
M G Uma
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
