Petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. seeking quashing of a domestic violence maintenance complaint dismissed for non-compliance with office objections; petitioner's counsel absent and matter listed for the fourth time without objections being cleared.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 3RD DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2024
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MRS JUSTICE M G UMA CRIMINAL PETITION No. 6308 OF 2020
BETWEEN:
SRI B.SREEKANTH S/O BOREGOWDA AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS R/AT BYRAVI PUMPS PVT. LTD, No. 161/34, 3RD MAIN ROAD INDUSTRIAL TOWNSHIP RAJAJINAGAR BENGALURU – 560 044.
…PETITIONER
(BY SRI MANJUNATH.B.N, ADVOCATE - ABSENT)
AND:
Digitally signed by HEMAVATHY GANGABYRAPPA
Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
No.1 AND 2 ARE MINORS HENCE THEY ARE REPRESENTED THROUGH THEIR NATURAL GUARDIAN MOTHER SMT.S.R.RADHA.
No.1 & 2 ARE RESIDING No. 5 AND 6, 13TH CROSS HOYSALA NAGAR KATTE BENGALURU – 560 091. AT PRESENT RESIDING AT
NC: 2024:KHC:35824 CRL.P No. 6308 of 2020
SARIMEGULU KOPPALU VILLAGE KASABA HOBLI, NAGAMANGALA TALUK MANDYA DISTRICT.
…RESPONDENTS
THIS CRL.P IS FILED U/S.482 CR.P.C PRAYING TO QUASH THE COMPLAINT FILED U/S 12 OF D.V. ACT, 2005, FOR MAINTENANCE IN CRL.MISC.No.04/2018, WHICH IS PENDING ON THE FILE OF PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE AND J.M.F.C., NAGAMANGALA AND CONSEQUENTLY QUASH THE PROCEEDINGS IN CRL.MISC.No.04/2018 WHICH IS PENDING ON THE FILE OF PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE AND J.M.F.C., NAGAMANGALA.
THIS PETITION COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MRS JUSTICE M G UMA
ORAL ORDER
Learned counsel for the petitioner is absent. No representation.
Office objections have not been complied with even though the matter is listed for the fourth time.
The order sheet dated 26.06.2024 reads as under;
“One week time is granted to comply with the office objections, failing which, the petition shall stand dismissed.”
NC: 2024:KHC:35824 CRL.P No. 6308 of 2020
Inspite of that, there is non compliance of office objections. I do not find any reason to adjourn the matter.
Hence, the petition is dismissed for non
compliance of office objections.
Sd/(M G UMA) JUDGE
GH
List No.: 1 Sl No.: 24
2 provisions across 2 enactments
B. Sreekanth
S.R. Radha
Inchara S.
M G Uma
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
