Sri Shankaranarayana Bhat v. Sri Ramachandra a Shet
Case brief
What is this about?
Criminal petition filed u/s 482 CrPC to quash a JMFC order was dismissed for repeated non-compliance of office objections, with counsel absent at the third listing.
Criminal petition filed u/s 482 CrPC to quash a JMFC order was dismissed for repeated non-compliance of office objections, with counsel absent at the third listing.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 3RD DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2024
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MRS JUSTICE M G UMA
CRIMINAL PETITION No. 6668 OF 2020
BETWEEN:
SRI SHANKARANARAYANA BHAT S/O SRI BHASKAR BHAT AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS NANDINI AGENCY, FERTILISER MERCHAT NEXT TO YELLAMMA TEMPLE SORABA ROAD, SAGAR SHIVAMOGA DISTRICT – 577 401.
…PETITIONER
Digitally signed by HEMAVATHY GANGABYRAPPA Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
(BY SRI MAHESH B J, ADVOCATE - ABSENT)
AND:
SRI RAMACHANDRA A SHET S/O SRI ANANTHA SHET AGED ABOUT 61 YEARS GOLDSMITH, SOMANATH NILAYA SHIVAJI ROAD, SAGARA TOWN SAGARA SHIMOGA DISTRICT – 577 401.
…RESPONDENT
THIS CRL.P IS FILED U/S.482 CR.P.C PRAYING TO SET ASIDE/QUASH THE ORDER DATED 12.02.2020 PASSED BY THE COURT OF PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, SAGAR IN C.C.No.16/2019 (ANNEXURE-A).
THIS PETITION COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MRS JUSTICE M G UMA
NC: 2024:KHC:35849 CRL.P No. 6668 of 2020
ORAL ORDER
Learned counsel for the petitioner is absent. No
representation.
Office objections have not been complied with even though the matter is listed for the third time.
The order sheet dated 27.06.2024 reads as under;
“Two weeks time is granted to comply with the office objections, failing which the petition stands dismissed.”
Inspite of that, there is non compliance of office objections. I do not find any reason to adjourn the matter.
Hence, the petition is dismissed for non compliance of office objections.
Sd/(M G UMA) JUDGE
GH List No.: 1 Sl No.: 11
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Sri Shankaranarayana Bhat
Sri Ramachandra A Shet
M G Uma
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court