Petitioner sought quashing of criminal proceedings; however, counsel filed a memo to withdraw the petition, leading the court to dismiss it as infructuous and dispose of the accompanying stay application.
Petition dismissed as infructuous upon withdrawal by counsel; stay application disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 5TH DAY OF APRIL, 2024
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE SURAJ GOVINDARAJ CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 6467 OF 2018
BETWEEN:
MS. NOUSHEEN ANJUM, AGED ABOUT 36 YEARS, W/O FIYAZ KHAN, RESIDING AT NO. 7/55, AMIN MANZIL, S.R.K GARDEN, 3RD CROSS, TILAKNAGAR, BENGALURU - 560 041.
…PETITIONER
(BY SRI. PAVANA B.K, ADVOCATE FOR SRI. MOHAMMED RIYAZULLA R, ADVOCATE)
AND:
Digitally signed by NARAYANAPPA LAKSHMAMMA Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
…RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. CHANNAPPA ERAPPA, HCGP)
NC: 2024:KHC:14228 CRL.P No. 6467 of 2018
THIS CRL.P IS FILED U/S.482 OF CR.P.C PRAYING TO QUASH THE PROCEEDINGS IN C.C.NO.24126/2015 (CR.145/2014) ON THE FILE OF THE IV ACMM, BANGALORE, FOR THE OFFENCES P/U/S 409, 420, 506 R/W 34 OF IPC, BY ALLOWING THE ABOVE PETITION.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ADMISSION, THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
ORDER
petitioner has been filed, which reads as under:
"The counsel for the petitioner most humbly prays this Hon'ble Court may be pleased to permit the counsel on record for petitioner to withdraw the above petition and further be pleased to dismiss the aforesaid case as not pressed, for the reason that the case is pending for Evidence before the Trial Court."
NC: 2024:KHC:14228 CRL.P No. 6467 of 2018
Sd/JUDGE
GJM List No.: 1 Sl No.: 47 CT: BHK
MS. NOUSHEEN ANJUM
MRS. S.G. SRINIVAS
STATE OF KARNATAKA
SURAJ GOVINDARAJ
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
