The High Court at Bengaluru dismissed a company application seeking to recall a winding-up order for non-prosecution due to non-compliance with objections and lack of appearance by the applicant.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
NC: 2024:KHC:10641 CA No. 1119 of 2012 In COP No. 117 of 2010
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 4TH DAY OF APRIL, 2024
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE SURAJ GOVINDARAJ COMPANY APPLICATION NO. 1119 OF 2012
IN
COMPANY PETITION NO.117 OF 2010
BETWEEN:
DHEERENDRA C.R AGED 33 YEARS, S/O SRI. RAJANNA NO.2, SULIKUNTE COLONY, MUTTANALLUR CROSS, SARJAPUR ROAD, BANGALORE 560 099.
…APPLICANT
(BY SRI. M ARUN PONAPPA.,ADVOCATE-ABSENT)
AND:
Digitally signed by NARAYANAPPA LAKSHMAMMA Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
…RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. JAGADEESH GOUD PATIL .,ADVOCATE FOR O.L)
THIS COMPANY APPLICATION IS FILED UNDER RULE 6 READ WITH RULE 9 OF THE COMPANIES (COURT) RULES, 1959 PRAYING TO RECALL THE ORDER DATED 16.04.2012 WINDING UP THE FIRST RESPONDENT COMPANY.
THIS COMPANY APPLICATION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
ORDER
Sd/JUDGE
LN
List No.1: Sl No.45
DHEERENDRA C.R AGED 33 YEARS
M/S UNEX CARGO PVT. LTD.
M/S HDFC BANK PVT. LTD.
SURAJ GOVINDARAJ
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
