The High Court of Karnataka dismissed a Criminal Petition filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C. seeking quashing of an FIR, holding that exercising jurisdiction was not warranted as the case was at the stage of evidence before the court.
null
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
NC: 2024:KHC:20296 CRL.P No. 2560 of 2022
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 10TH DAY OF JUNE, 2024
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA
CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 2560 OF 2022
BETWEEN:
Digitally signed by NAGAVENI Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
…PETITIONERS
(BY SRI. KESHAV MURTHY K R., ADVOCATE)
AND:
NC: 2024:KHC:20296 CRL.P No. 2560 of 2022
…RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. B.N. JAGADEESH, ADDL.SPP FOR R1)
THIS CRL.P IS FILED U/S.482 CR.P.C PRAYING TO QUASH THE FIR IN CR.NO.65/2021 WHICH IS PENDING INVESTIGATION BEFORE THE RESPONDENT NO.1 POLICE FOR THE OFFENCE P/U/S.417,420,465,468,471,34 OF IPC PENDING BEFORE ADDL.CIVIL JUDGE (JR.DN) AND J.M.F.C COURT MUDIGERE CHIKKAMAGALURU DISTRICT, AT ANNEXURE-A.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ADMISSION, THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
ORDER
Learned Additional State Public Prosecutor on instructions
would submit that charges have been framed and the matter is at the stage of evidence before the concerned Court.
petitioners.
NC: 2024:KHC:20296 CRL.P No. 2560 of 2022
Court, exercising jurisdiction under Section 482 of Cr.P.C., would not be warranted.
Sd/JUDGE
KG List No.: 1 Sl No.: 2
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Mr H R Adarsh S/o Late H P Rudregowda And Mrs Shree Rekha W/o Mr H R Adarsh
State Of Karnataka By Bankal Police Bankal Mudigere Taluk Rep. By State Public Prosecutor High Court Complex Bangalore-560001
Mr H R Shiva Kumar S/o Late H P Rudregowda
M. Nagaprasanna
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
