Disposed

Mrs Anitha Reshma M Galarani v. Mr P Ramesh Kumar

Karnataka HC10 Jun 2024CRL.P/2115/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

A petitioner sought a direction to the trial court to expedite disposal of a pending criminal case marked by continuous adjournments and the accused's non-appearance. The High Court directed completion of proceedings within nine months, if not earlier, and disposed of the petition.

What did the court decide?

Direction to the XVIII Addl. Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Bengaluru to dispose of C.C.No.18305/2022 within nine months, if not earlier.

Mrs Anitha Reshma M Galarani Vs Mr P Ramesh… — Civil Procedure and Limitation | Karnataka HC (2024)

¶1

1 - NC: 2024:KHC:20225 CRL.P No. 2115 of 2024

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

¶3

DATED THIS THE 10^TH DAY OF JUNE, 2024

¶4

BEFORE

¶5

THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA

¶6

CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 2115 OF 2024

¶7

BETWEEN:

¶8

MRS. ANITHA RESHMA M. GALARANI, W/O MR. MANOHAR GALRANI, AGED ABOUT 54 YEARS, RESIDING AT FLAT NO.130, 5^TH CROSS, DASARAHALLI ROAD, BHUVANESHWARI NAGAR, BANGALORE - 560 024

¶9

…PETITIONER

¶10

(BY SMT. PRIYANKA K.N., ADVOCATE)

¶11

AND:

¶12

Digitally signed by MARIGANGAIAH PREMAKUMARI Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA

¶13

MR. P. RAMESH KUMAR, MAJOR, FATHERS NAME NOT KNOWN TO COMPLAINANT, RESIDING AT FLAT NO.807, 8^TH FLOOR, ADITYA DSR LAKE SIDE APARTMENT, KFC BACK SIDE GACCHIBOLI, J.V. COLONY, MAIN ROAD, HYDERABAD - 500 032

¶14

…RESPONDENT

¶15

¶16

NC: 2024:KHC:20225 CRL.P No. 2115 of 2024

¶17

THIS CRL.P IS FILED U/S.482 OF CR.P.C PRAYING TO DIRECTING THE XVIII ADDITIONAL CHIEF METROPOLITAN MAGISTRATE BENGALURU TO DISPOSE OF THE C.C.NO.18305/2022 AS EXPEDITIOUSLY AS POSSIBLE AND TO PASS SUCH OTHER DECLARATION, DIRECTIONS AS THIS HONBLE COURT.

¶18

THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ADMISSION, THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:

¶19

ORDER

¶20

The petitioner is before this Court seeking the following prayer:

¶21

" WHEREFORE the Petitioners pray that this Hon'ble court may be pleased to directing the XVIII Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Bengaluru to dispose of the C.C.No.18305/2022 as expeditiously as possible and to pass such other declaration, directions as this Hon'ble court may deem fit, in the interest of justice and equity."

¶22

Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner

¶23

demonstrates that there has been continuous adjournment granted in the case at hand and the accused is not appearing before the concerned Court.

¶24

¶25

NC: 2024:KHC:20225 CRL.P No. 2115 of 2024

¶26

In the light of the proceedings of the year 2022,

¶27

I deem it appropriate to direct the concerned court to dispose the matter, within nine months, if not earlier.

¶28

With the aforesaid observations, the petition stands

disposed.

Ordered accordingly.

SD/JUDGE

KG List No.: 1 Sl No.: 89

Mrs Anitha Reshma M Galarani v. Mr P Ramesh Kumar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Mrs Anitha Reshma M Galarani v. Mr P Ramesh Kumar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Putteeregowda Vs the Sub Inspector of Police

Berggruen Properties Private Limited Vs the Inspector General of Stamps

Kalavathi Patil Vs State by

P. Nanda Kumar Vs the State by Girinagar P.S.

Mrs. Swathi Vs the State of Karnataka

Mr H R Adarsh Vs State of Karnataka